Cargando…

Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy

AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talvitie, Tuula, Helminen, Mika, Karsila, Susanna, Pirttiniemi, Pertti, Signorelli, Luca, Varho, Reeta, Peltomäki, Timo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051
_version_ 1785021797689720832
author Talvitie, Tuula
Helminen, Mika
Karsila, Susanna
Pirttiniemi, Pertti
Signorelli, Luca
Varho, Reeta
Peltomäki, Timo
author_facet Talvitie, Tuula
Helminen, Mika
Karsila, Susanna
Pirttiniemi, Pertti
Signorelli, Luca
Varho, Reeta
Peltomäki, Timo
author_sort Talvitie, Tuula
collection PubMed
description AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were asked to use CHG for 10 hours a day for 10 months. The outer bow of the CHG facebow was raised 10–20 degrees and the inner bow expanded 3–4 mm. Adherence to instructions and force magnitude were monitored with an electronic module (Smartgear, Swissorthodontics, Switzerland). Impressions for study models were taken before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and the study models were scanned into digital form (3Shape, R700 Scanner, Denmark). Measurements were made using the digital models (Planmeca Romexis, Model analyser, Finland). RESULTS: During the treatment (T1–T2) the upper inter-canine distance increased by 2.83 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.60 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H force magnitude groups, respectively. Upper inter-molar width increased by 3.16 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.50 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively. Maxillary total arch perimeter increased by 6.39 mm (P = 0.001) and 6.68 mm (P = 0.001) in the L and H groups, respectively. In the amount of change over time, T1–T2, in the upper arch measurements, no significant difference was found between the groups. Lower inter-canine width increased by 0.94 mm (P = 0.005) and 1.16 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively; no difference between the groups. Lower inter-molar distance increased by 2.17 mm (P = 0.000) and 1.11 mm (P = 0.008) in the L and H groups, respectively. At the end of the study, upper and lower inter-molar width was larger in the L group than in the H group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: CHG therapy is an effective method for expanding and releasing moderate crowding of the upper dental arch. The lower arch spontaneously follows the upper arch in widening effects, and minor expansion can also be seen on the lower arch. In the L group, larger inter-molar width was achieved on the upper and lower arch; probably due to better adherence to instructions. Light force is recommended for use in CHG therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100847162023-04-11 Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy Talvitie, Tuula Helminen, Mika Karsila, Susanna Pirttiniemi, Pertti Signorelli, Luca Varho, Reeta Peltomäki, Timo Eur J Orthod Original Articles AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were asked to use CHG for 10 hours a day for 10 months. The outer bow of the CHG facebow was raised 10–20 degrees and the inner bow expanded 3–4 mm. Adherence to instructions and force magnitude were monitored with an electronic module (Smartgear, Swissorthodontics, Switzerland). Impressions for study models were taken before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and the study models were scanned into digital form (3Shape, R700 Scanner, Denmark). Measurements were made using the digital models (Planmeca Romexis, Model analyser, Finland). RESULTS: During the treatment (T1–T2) the upper inter-canine distance increased by 2.83 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.60 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H force magnitude groups, respectively. Upper inter-molar width increased by 3.16 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.50 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively. Maxillary total arch perimeter increased by 6.39 mm (P = 0.001) and 6.68 mm (P = 0.001) in the L and H groups, respectively. In the amount of change over time, T1–T2, in the upper arch measurements, no significant difference was found between the groups. Lower inter-canine width increased by 0.94 mm (P = 0.005) and 1.16 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively; no difference between the groups. Lower inter-molar distance increased by 2.17 mm (P = 0.000) and 1.11 mm (P = 0.008) in the L and H groups, respectively. At the end of the study, upper and lower inter-molar width was larger in the L group than in the H group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: CHG therapy is an effective method for expanding and releasing moderate crowding of the upper dental arch. The lower arch spontaneously follows the upper arch in widening effects, and minor expansion can also be seen on the lower arch. In the L group, larger inter-molar width was achieved on the upper and lower arch; probably due to better adherence to instructions. Light force is recommended for use in CHG therapy. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10084716/ /pubmed/34369566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Talvitie, Tuula
Helminen, Mika
Karsila, Susanna
Pirttiniemi, Pertti
Signorelli, Luca
Varho, Reeta
Peltomäki, Timo
Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title_full Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title_fullStr Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title_full_unstemmed Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title_short Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
title_sort effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051
work_keys_str_mv AT talvitietuula effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT helminenmika effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT karsilasusanna effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT pirttiniemipertti effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT signorelliluca effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT varhoreeta effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy
AT peltomakitimo effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy