Cargando…
Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy
AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051 |
_version_ | 1785021797689720832 |
---|---|
author | Talvitie, Tuula Helminen, Mika Karsila, Susanna Pirttiniemi, Pertti Signorelli, Luca Varho, Reeta Peltomäki, Timo |
author_facet | Talvitie, Tuula Helminen, Mika Karsila, Susanna Pirttiniemi, Pertti Signorelli, Luca Varho, Reeta Peltomäki, Timo |
author_sort | Talvitie, Tuula |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were asked to use CHG for 10 hours a day for 10 months. The outer bow of the CHG facebow was raised 10–20 degrees and the inner bow expanded 3–4 mm. Adherence to instructions and force magnitude were monitored with an electronic module (Smartgear, Swissorthodontics, Switzerland). Impressions for study models were taken before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and the study models were scanned into digital form (3Shape, R700 Scanner, Denmark). Measurements were made using the digital models (Planmeca Romexis, Model analyser, Finland). RESULTS: During the treatment (T1–T2) the upper inter-canine distance increased by 2.83 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.60 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H force magnitude groups, respectively. Upper inter-molar width increased by 3.16 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.50 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively. Maxillary total arch perimeter increased by 6.39 mm (P = 0.001) and 6.68 mm (P = 0.001) in the L and H groups, respectively. In the amount of change over time, T1–T2, in the upper arch measurements, no significant difference was found between the groups. Lower inter-canine width increased by 0.94 mm (P = 0.005) and 1.16 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively; no difference between the groups. Lower inter-molar distance increased by 2.17 mm (P = 0.000) and 1.11 mm (P = 0.008) in the L and H groups, respectively. At the end of the study, upper and lower inter-molar width was larger in the L group than in the H group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: CHG therapy is an effective method for expanding and releasing moderate crowding of the upper dental arch. The lower arch spontaneously follows the upper arch in widening effects, and minor expansion can also be seen on the lower arch. In the L group, larger inter-molar width was achieved on the upper and lower arch; probably due to better adherence to instructions. Light force is recommended for use in CHG therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10084716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100847162023-04-11 Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy Talvitie, Tuula Helminen, Mika Karsila, Susanna Pirttiniemi, Pertti Signorelli, Luca Varho, Reeta Peltomäki, Timo Eur J Orthod Original Articles AIM: To study the influence of different force magnitudes on dental arches in cervical headgear (CHG) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this controlled clinical trial, patients (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g, n = 22) or heavy force (H, 500 g, n = 18) magnitude. Subjects were asked to use CHG for 10 hours a day for 10 months. The outer bow of the CHG facebow was raised 10–20 degrees and the inner bow expanded 3–4 mm. Adherence to instructions and force magnitude were monitored with an electronic module (Smartgear, Swissorthodontics, Switzerland). Impressions for study models were taken before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and the study models were scanned into digital form (3Shape, R700 Scanner, Denmark). Measurements were made using the digital models (Planmeca Romexis, Model analyser, Finland). RESULTS: During the treatment (T1–T2) the upper inter-canine distance increased by 2.83 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.60 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H force magnitude groups, respectively. Upper inter-molar width increased by 3.16 mm (P = 0.000) and 2.50 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively. Maxillary total arch perimeter increased by 6.39 mm (P = 0.001) and 6.68 mm (P = 0.001) in the L and H groups, respectively. In the amount of change over time, T1–T2, in the upper arch measurements, no significant difference was found between the groups. Lower inter-canine width increased by 0.94 mm (P = 0.005) and 1.16 mm (P = 0.000) in the L and H groups, respectively; no difference between the groups. Lower inter-molar distance increased by 2.17 mm (P = 0.000) and 1.11 mm (P = 0.008) in the L and H groups, respectively. At the end of the study, upper and lower inter-molar width was larger in the L group than in the H group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: CHG therapy is an effective method for expanding and releasing moderate crowding of the upper dental arch. The lower arch spontaneously follows the upper arch in widening effects, and minor expansion can also be seen on the lower arch. In the L group, larger inter-molar width was achieved on the upper and lower arch; probably due to better adherence to instructions. Light force is recommended for use in CHG therapy. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10084716/ /pubmed/34369566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Talvitie, Tuula Helminen, Mika Karsila, Susanna Pirttiniemi, Pertti Signorelli, Luca Varho, Reeta Peltomäki, Timo Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title | Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title_full | Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title_fullStr | Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title_short | Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
title_sort | effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34369566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talvitietuula effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT helminenmika effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT karsilasusanna effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT pirttiniemipertti effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT signorelliluca effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT varhoreeta effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy AT peltomakitimo effectsofforcemagnitudeondentalarchesincervicalheadgeartherapy |