Cargando…

Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology

It is important to optimize the drying process, along with the concentration of drying aid and the inlet air temperature, in order to obtain products with better physicochemical properties. Onion–stevia leaf hot extract powders were prepared using gum arabic (GA) and whey protein concentrate (WPC)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hae‐Il, Ameer, Kashif, Chung, Young Bae, Min, Sung‐Gi, Eun, Jong‐Bang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3207
_version_ 1785021839446114304
author Yang, Hae‐Il
Ameer, Kashif
Chung, Young Bae
Min, Sung‐Gi
Eun, Jong‐Bang
author_facet Yang, Hae‐Il
Ameer, Kashif
Chung, Young Bae
Min, Sung‐Gi
Eun, Jong‐Bang
author_sort Yang, Hae‐Il
collection PubMed
description It is important to optimize the drying process, along with the concentration of drying aid and the inlet air temperature, in order to obtain products with better physicochemical properties. Onion–stevia leaf hot extract powders were prepared using gum arabic (GA) and whey protein concentrate (WPC). Inlet air temperature and carrier concentrations were optimized using response surface methodology. The drying yield of powdered extracts was 14.39–74.32%, L*‐ value was 52.66–66.98, bulk density was 0.36–0.75 (g/cm(3)), moisture content was 2.40–11.57%, water solubility index was 30.32%–97.46%, and mean particle size D[4,3] was 9.13–88.01 (μm). For both GA‐ and WPC‐based powders, optimal inlet air temperatures and carrier concentrations were 148.81 and 144.62°C, and 11.58 and 12.03% (w/v), respectively. GA powders had a higher glass transition temperature (76.49°C) as compared to WPC powders (48.12°C) or maltodextrin as control (55.49°C). Sweetness (5.0/7.0) and overall acceptability (4.3/7.0) scores were higher for GA powders as compared to WPC powders (3.7/7.0 and 3.4/7.0), respectively. Conclusively, GA is a better carrier than whey protein for preparing spray‐dried onion–stevia powder that can be used as a natural sweetener.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10084984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100849842023-04-11 Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology Yang, Hae‐Il Ameer, Kashif Chung, Young Bae Min, Sung‐Gi Eun, Jong‐Bang Food Sci Nutr Original Articles It is important to optimize the drying process, along with the concentration of drying aid and the inlet air temperature, in order to obtain products with better physicochemical properties. Onion–stevia leaf hot extract powders were prepared using gum arabic (GA) and whey protein concentrate (WPC). Inlet air temperature and carrier concentrations were optimized using response surface methodology. The drying yield of powdered extracts was 14.39–74.32%, L*‐ value was 52.66–66.98, bulk density was 0.36–0.75 (g/cm(3)), moisture content was 2.40–11.57%, water solubility index was 30.32%–97.46%, and mean particle size D[4,3] was 9.13–88.01 (μm). For both GA‐ and WPC‐based powders, optimal inlet air temperatures and carrier concentrations were 148.81 and 144.62°C, and 11.58 and 12.03% (w/v), respectively. GA powders had a higher glass transition temperature (76.49°C) as compared to WPC powders (48.12°C) or maltodextrin as control (55.49°C). Sweetness (5.0/7.0) and overall acceptability (4.3/7.0) scores were higher for GA powders as compared to WPC powders (3.7/7.0 and 3.4/7.0), respectively. Conclusively, GA is a better carrier than whey protein for preparing spray‐dried onion–stevia powder that can be used as a natural sweetener. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10084984/ /pubmed/37051362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3207 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yang, Hae‐Il
Ameer, Kashif
Chung, Young Bae
Min, Sung‐Gi
Eun, Jong‐Bang
Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title_full Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title_fullStr Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title_short Optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
title_sort optimization of spray drying process for recovery of onion–stevia leaf hot water extract powder using response surface methodology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3207
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghaeil optimizationofspraydryingprocessforrecoveryofonionstevialeafhotwaterextractpowderusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT ameerkashif optimizationofspraydryingprocessforrecoveryofonionstevialeafhotwaterextractpowderusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT chungyoungbae optimizationofspraydryingprocessforrecoveryofonionstevialeafhotwaterextractpowderusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT minsunggi optimizationofspraydryingprocessforrecoveryofonionstevialeafhotwaterextractpowderusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT eunjongbang optimizationofspraydryingprocessforrecoveryofonionstevialeafhotwaterextractpowderusingresponsesurfacemethodology