Cargando…
A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China
With the deepening of a new round of technological revolution and industrial reform, digital technology has been continuously innovated and widely penetrated into various economic fields. The digital economy (DE) is gradually becoming the focus of China’s economic development planning and a new engi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283655 |
_version_ | 1785021855965380608 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Haoran Wang, Yuchen Guo, Sen |
author_facet | Zhao, Haoran Wang, Yuchen Guo, Sen |
author_sort | Zhao, Haoran |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the deepening of a new round of technological revolution and industrial reform, digital technology has been continuously innovated and widely penetrated into various economic fields. The digital economy (DE) is gradually becoming the focus of China’s economic development planning and a new engine to enhance national strength. Evaluating the development level of DE in various regions is conducive to timely discover the shortcomings in China’s DE development, as well as provide an important basis for putting forward corresponding policy suggestions. This investigation established a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for evaluating DE development of 31 provincial level regions in China ranging from 2015 to 2020. Firstly, the evaluation indicator system is established from digital infrastructure, integrated development, social benefits, innovation ability, and electronic-commerce dimensions containing 17 quantitative sub-criteria based on Fuzzy-Delphi method. Secondly, integrated weights of 17 sub-criteria from 2015 to 2020 are computed in terms of objective weights calculated by the anti-entropy weight (AEW) approach from 2015 to 2020 and subjective weights obtained via the best-worst method (BWM). Thirdly, MARCOS model is applied to evaluate the DE development degree of various regions in China ranging from 2015 to 2020. Case analysis illustrates that the DE development of Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Beijing always maintain in the top four from 2015 to 2020, while the southwest and northwest regions in China are obviously fall behind others. And the DE development degree of various regions is primarily affected under the integrated development performance, innovation ability performance, and social benefits performance. Therefore, the backward regions should emphasize the development of software industry and information technology industry. The robustness of the proposed MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM and MARCOS is discussed employing three similarity coefficients of rankings. And it is verified that the proposed MCDM model has superior robustness and validity in evaluating DE development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10085058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100850582023-04-11 A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China Zhao, Haoran Wang, Yuchen Guo, Sen PLoS One Research Article With the deepening of a new round of technological revolution and industrial reform, digital technology has been continuously innovated and widely penetrated into various economic fields. The digital economy (DE) is gradually becoming the focus of China’s economic development planning and a new engine to enhance national strength. Evaluating the development level of DE in various regions is conducive to timely discover the shortcomings in China’s DE development, as well as provide an important basis for putting forward corresponding policy suggestions. This investigation established a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for evaluating DE development of 31 provincial level regions in China ranging from 2015 to 2020. Firstly, the evaluation indicator system is established from digital infrastructure, integrated development, social benefits, innovation ability, and electronic-commerce dimensions containing 17 quantitative sub-criteria based on Fuzzy-Delphi method. Secondly, integrated weights of 17 sub-criteria from 2015 to 2020 are computed in terms of objective weights calculated by the anti-entropy weight (AEW) approach from 2015 to 2020 and subjective weights obtained via the best-worst method (BWM). Thirdly, MARCOS model is applied to evaluate the DE development degree of various regions in China ranging from 2015 to 2020. Case analysis illustrates that the DE development of Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Beijing always maintain in the top four from 2015 to 2020, while the southwest and northwest regions in China are obviously fall behind others. And the DE development degree of various regions is primarily affected under the integrated development performance, innovation ability performance, and social benefits performance. Therefore, the backward regions should emphasize the development of software industry and information technology industry. The robustness of the proposed MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM and MARCOS is discussed employing three similarity coefficients of rankings. And it is verified that the proposed MCDM model has superior robustness and validity in evaluating DE development. Public Library of Science 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10085058/ /pubmed/37036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283655 Text en © 2023 Zhao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhao, Haoran Wang, Yuchen Guo, Sen A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title | A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title_full | A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title_fullStr | A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title_full_unstemmed | A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title_short | A hybrid MCDM model combining Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in China |
title_sort | hybrid mcdm model combining fuzzy-delphi, aew, bwm, and marcos for digital economy development comprehensive evaluation of 31 provincial level regions in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaohaoran ahybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina AT wangyuchen ahybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina AT guosen ahybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina AT zhaohaoran hybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina AT wangyuchen hybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina AT guosen hybridmcdmmodelcombiningfuzzydelphiaewbwmandmarcosfordigitaleconomydevelopmentcomprehensiveevaluationof31provinciallevelregionsinchina |