Cargando…
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Objectives The “marionette technique” for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772 |
_version_ | 1785021977106317312 |
---|---|
author | Sohail, Amir H. Silverstein, Jeffrey Hakmi, Hazim Pacheco, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Hadi, Yousaf B. Gangwani, Manesh Kumar Aziz, Muhammad Ajouz, Hana Shin, David |
author_facet | Sohail, Amir H. Silverstein, Jeffrey Hakmi, Hazim Pacheco, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Hadi, Yousaf B. Gangwani, Manesh Kumar Aziz, Muhammad Ajouz, Hana Shin, David |
author_sort | Sohail, Amir H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives The “marionette technique” for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. Results M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( p < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, p -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, p -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02–2.39). Conclusion With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. Level of evidence Level III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10085643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100856432023-04-11 Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Sohail, Amir H. Silverstein, Jeffrey Hakmi, Hazim Pacheco, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Hadi, Yousaf B. Gangwani, Manesh Kumar Aziz, Muhammad Ajouz, Hana Shin, David Surg J (N Y) Objectives The “marionette technique” for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. Results M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( p < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, p -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, p -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02–2.39). Conclusion With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. Level of evidence Level III. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10085643/ /pubmed/37051375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sohail, Amir H. Silverstein, Jeffrey Hakmi, Hazim Pacheco, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Hadi, Yousaf B. Gangwani, Manesh Kumar Aziz, Muhammad Ajouz, Hana Shin, David Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_short | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the marionette transumbilical approach is safe and efficient with careful patient selection: a comparative analysis with conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37051375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohailamirh singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT silversteinjeffrey singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT hakmihazim singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT pachecotuliobrasileirosilva singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT hadiyousafb singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT gangwanimaneshkumar singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT azizmuhammad singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT ajouzhana singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT shindavid singleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomyusingthemarionettetransumbilicalapproachissafeandefficientwithcarefulpatientselectionacomparativeanalysiswithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |