Cargando…

Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources

Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Brian K, Callahan, Clarice, Dwyer, C. Liam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056554
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031
_version_ 1785022021756780544
author Foster, Brian K
Callahan, Clarice
Dwyer, C. Liam
author_facet Foster, Brian K
Callahan, Clarice
Dwyer, C. Liam
author_sort Foster, Brian K
collection PubMed
description Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) were reviewed. The reading material from each topic page was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas. The reading level (FKGL) of each topic page was compared against an eighth-grade reading level, which corresponds to the average US reading level. Results A total of 170 online patient resources were reviewed, including 84 from the ASSH, 74 from the AAOS, and 12 from the AAHS. Overall, the mean FKGL was 9.1, and the mean FRE was 57.3. Overall, 50% of all hand and upper extremity online resources were written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Pairwise testing revealed topic pages written by the ASSH had lower FKGL compared to those written by the AAHS (p = 0.046). Conclusions Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics are, on average, written at a level that exceeds the ability of the average reader. Comparisons between organizations showed a statistical, but not clinical, difference in readability measures. An emphasis on improving readability should be maintained as professional organizations continue to develop their online patient resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10085876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100858762023-04-12 Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources Foster, Brian K Callahan, Clarice Dwyer, C. Liam Cureus Plastic Surgery Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) were reviewed. The reading material from each topic page was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas. The reading level (FKGL) of each topic page was compared against an eighth-grade reading level, which corresponds to the average US reading level. Results A total of 170 online patient resources were reviewed, including 84 from the ASSH, 74 from the AAOS, and 12 from the AAHS. Overall, the mean FKGL was 9.1, and the mean FRE was 57.3. Overall, 50% of all hand and upper extremity online resources were written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Pairwise testing revealed topic pages written by the ASSH had lower FKGL compared to those written by the AAHS (p = 0.046). Conclusions Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics are, on average, written at a level that exceeds the ability of the average reader. Comparisons between organizations showed a statistical, but not clinical, difference in readability measures. An emphasis on improving readability should be maintained as professional organizations continue to develop their online patient resources. Cureus 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10085876/ /pubmed/37056554 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031 Text en Copyright © 2023, Foster et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery
Foster, Brian K
Callahan, Clarice
Dwyer, C. Liam
Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title_full Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title_fullStr Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title_full_unstemmed Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title_short Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
title_sort readability of online hand and upper extremity patient resources
topic Plastic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056554
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031
work_keys_str_mv AT fosterbriank readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources
AT callahanclarice readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources
AT dwyercliam readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources