Cargando…
Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surg...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056554 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031 |
_version_ | 1785022021756780544 |
---|---|
author | Foster, Brian K Callahan, Clarice Dwyer, C. Liam |
author_facet | Foster, Brian K Callahan, Clarice Dwyer, C. Liam |
author_sort | Foster, Brian K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) were reviewed. The reading material from each topic page was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas. The reading level (FKGL) of each topic page was compared against an eighth-grade reading level, which corresponds to the average US reading level. Results A total of 170 online patient resources were reviewed, including 84 from the ASSH, 74 from the AAOS, and 12 from the AAHS. Overall, the mean FKGL was 9.1, and the mean FRE was 57.3. Overall, 50% of all hand and upper extremity online resources were written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Pairwise testing revealed topic pages written by the ASSH had lower FKGL compared to those written by the AAHS (p = 0.046). Conclusions Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics are, on average, written at a level that exceeds the ability of the average reader. Comparisons between organizations showed a statistical, but not clinical, difference in readability measures. An emphasis on improving readability should be maintained as professional organizations continue to develop their online patient resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10085876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100858762023-04-12 Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources Foster, Brian K Callahan, Clarice Dwyer, C. Liam Cureus Plastic Surgery Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) were reviewed. The reading material from each topic page was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas. The reading level (FKGL) of each topic page was compared against an eighth-grade reading level, which corresponds to the average US reading level. Results A total of 170 online patient resources were reviewed, including 84 from the ASSH, 74 from the AAOS, and 12 from the AAHS. Overall, the mean FKGL was 9.1, and the mean FRE was 57.3. Overall, 50% of all hand and upper extremity online resources were written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Pairwise testing revealed topic pages written by the ASSH had lower FKGL compared to those written by the AAHS (p = 0.046). Conclusions Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics are, on average, written at a level that exceeds the ability of the average reader. Comparisons between organizations showed a statistical, but not clinical, difference in readability measures. An emphasis on improving readability should be maintained as professional organizations continue to develop their online patient resources. Cureus 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10085876/ /pubmed/37056554 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031 Text en Copyright © 2023, Foster et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Plastic Surgery Foster, Brian K Callahan, Clarice Dwyer, C. Liam Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title | Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title_full | Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title_fullStr | Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title_full_unstemmed | Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title_short | Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources |
title_sort | readability of online hand and upper extremity patient resources |
topic | Plastic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056554 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fosterbriank readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources AT callahanclarice readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources AT dwyercliam readabilityofonlinehandandupperextremitypatientresources |