Cargando…
Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the implementation process of structured reporting (SR) in a tertiary care institution over a period of 7 years. METHODS: We analysed the content of our image database from January 2016 to December 2022 and compared the numbers of structured reports and free-text reports. For...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01408-7 |
_version_ | 1785022068972060672 |
---|---|
author | Jorg, Tobias Halfmann, Moritz C. Arnhold, Gordon Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Kloeckner, Roman Düber, Christoph Mildenberger, Peter Jungmann, Florian Müller, Lukas |
author_facet | Jorg, Tobias Halfmann, Moritz C. Arnhold, Gordon Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Kloeckner, Roman Düber, Christoph Mildenberger, Peter Jungmann, Florian Müller, Lukas |
author_sort | Jorg, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the implementation process of structured reporting (SR) in a tertiary care institution over a period of 7 years. METHODS: We analysed the content of our image database from January 2016 to December 2022 and compared the numbers of structured reports and free-text reports. For the ten most common SR templates, usage proportions were calculated on a quarterly basis. Annual modality-specific SR usage was calculated for ultrasound, CT, and MRI. During the implementation process, we surveyed radiologists and clinical referring physicians concerning their views on reporting in radiology. RESULTS: As of December 2022, our reporting platform contained more than 22,000 structured reports. Use of the ten most common SR templates increased markedly since their implementation, leading to a mean SR usage of 77% in Q4 2022. The highest percentages of SR usage were shown for trauma CT, focussed assessment with ultrasound for trauma (FAST), and prostate MRI: 97%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, in 2022. Overall modality-specific SR usage was 17% for ultrasound, 13% for CT, and 6% for MRI in 2022. Both radiologists and referring physicians were more satisfied with structured reports and rated SR better than free-text reporting (FTR) on various attributes. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing SR usage during the period under review and the positive attitude towards SR among both radiologists and clinical referrers show that SR can be successfully implemented. We therefore encourage others to take this step in order to benefit from the advantages of SR. KEY POINTS: 1. Structured reporting usage increased markedly since its implementation at our institution in 2016. 2. Mean usage for the ten most popular structured reporting templates was 77% in 2022. 3. Both radiologists and referring physicians preferred structured reports over free-text reports. 4. Our data shows that structured reporting can be successfully implemented. 5. We strongly encourage others to implement structured reporting at their institutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10086081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100860812023-04-12 Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience Jorg, Tobias Halfmann, Moritz C. Arnhold, Gordon Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Kloeckner, Roman Düber, Christoph Mildenberger, Peter Jungmann, Florian Müller, Lukas Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the implementation process of structured reporting (SR) in a tertiary care institution over a period of 7 years. METHODS: We analysed the content of our image database from January 2016 to December 2022 and compared the numbers of structured reports and free-text reports. For the ten most common SR templates, usage proportions were calculated on a quarterly basis. Annual modality-specific SR usage was calculated for ultrasound, CT, and MRI. During the implementation process, we surveyed radiologists and clinical referring physicians concerning their views on reporting in radiology. RESULTS: As of December 2022, our reporting platform contained more than 22,000 structured reports. Use of the ten most common SR templates increased markedly since their implementation, leading to a mean SR usage of 77% in Q4 2022. The highest percentages of SR usage were shown for trauma CT, focussed assessment with ultrasound for trauma (FAST), and prostate MRI: 97%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, in 2022. Overall modality-specific SR usage was 17% for ultrasound, 13% for CT, and 6% for MRI in 2022. Both radiologists and referring physicians were more satisfied with structured reports and rated SR better than free-text reporting (FTR) on various attributes. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing SR usage during the period under review and the positive attitude towards SR among both radiologists and clinical referrers show that SR can be successfully implemented. We therefore encourage others to take this step in order to benefit from the advantages of SR. KEY POINTS: 1. Structured reporting usage increased markedly since its implementation at our institution in 2016. 2. Mean usage for the ten most popular structured reporting templates was 77% in 2022. 3. Both radiologists and referring physicians preferred structured reports over free-text reports. 4. Our data shows that structured reporting can be successfully implemented. 5. We strongly encourage others to implement structured reporting at their institutions. Springer Vienna 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10086081/ /pubmed/37037963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01408-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jorg, Tobias Halfmann, Moritz C. Arnhold, Gordon Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Kloeckner, Roman Düber, Christoph Mildenberger, Peter Jungmann, Florian Müller, Lukas Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title | Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title_full | Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title_fullStr | Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title_short | Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
title_sort | implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37037963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01408-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jorgtobias implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT halfmannmoritzc implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT arnholdgordon implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT pintodossantosdaniel implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT kloecknerroman implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT duberchristoph implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT mildenbergerpeter implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT jungmannflorian implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience AT mullerlukas implementationofstructuredreportinginclinicalroutineareviewof7yearsofinstitutionalexperience |