Cargando…

Fully automated grading system for the evaluation of punctate epithelial erosions using deep neural networks

PURPOSE: The goal was to develop a fully automated grading system for the evaluation of punctate epithelial erosions (PEEs) using deep neural networks. METHODS: A fully automated system was developed to detect corneal position and grade staining severity given a corneal fluorescein staining image. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Jing-Hao, Qin, Xiao-Ran, Li, Chen-Di, Peng, Rong-Mei, Xiao, Ge-Ge, Cheng, Jian, Gu, Shao-Feng, Wang, Hai-Kun, Hong, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319755
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The goal was to develop a fully automated grading system for the evaluation of punctate epithelial erosions (PEEs) using deep neural networks. METHODS: A fully automated system was developed to detect corneal position and grade staining severity given a corneal fluorescein staining image. The fully automated pipeline consists of the following three steps: a corneal segmentation model extracts corneal area; five image patches are cropped from the staining image based on the five subregions of extracted cornea; a staining grading model predicts a score for each image patch from 0 to 3, and automated grading score for the whole cornea is obtained from 0 to 15. Finally, the clinical grading scores annotated by three ophthalmologists were compared with automated grading scores. RESULTS: For corneal segmentation, the segmentation model achieved an intersection over union of 0.937. For punctate staining grading, the grading model achieved a classification accuracy of 76.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.940 (95% CI 0.932 to 0.949). For the fully automated pipeline, Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the clinical and automated grading scores was 0.908 (p<0.01). Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement between the clinical and automated grading scores of between −4.125 and 3.720 (concordance correlation coefficient=0.904). The average time required for processing a single stained image during pipeline was 0.58 s. CONCLUSION: A fully automated grading system was developed to evaluate PEEs. The grading results may serve as a reference for ophthalmologists in clinical trials and residency training procedures.