Cargando…
Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still on the rise in North America and Europe and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The treatment of HCC varies, with surgery and locoregional therapy (LRT) such as radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792205 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2022-0118 |
_version_ | 1785022144681345024 |
---|---|
author | Tsujita, Yushi Sofue, Keitaro Ueshima, Eisuke Ueno, Yoshiko Hori, Masatoshi Tsurusaki, Masakatsu Murakami, Takamichi |
author_facet | Tsujita, Yushi Sofue, Keitaro Ueshima, Eisuke Ueno, Yoshiko Hori, Masatoshi Tsurusaki, Masakatsu Murakami, Takamichi |
author_sort | Tsujita, Yushi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still on the rise in North America and Europe and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The treatment of HCC varies, with surgery and locoregional therapy (LRT) such as radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and radiation therapy being the primary treatment. Currently, systemic therapy with molecular-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is becoming a major treatment option for the unresectable HCC. As the HCC after LRT or systemic therapy often remains unchanged in size and shows loss of contrast effect in contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria, which are usually used to evaluate the treatment response of solid tumors, are not appropriate for HCC. The modified RECIST (mRECIST) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria were developed for HCC, with a focus on viable lesions. The latest 2018 edition of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) also includes a section on the evaluation of treatment response. The cancer microenvironment influences the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. Several studies have examined the utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting the pathological and molecular genetic patterns of HCC. In the future, it may be possible to stratify prognosis and predict treatment response prior to systemic therapy by using pre-treatment imaging findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10086401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100864012023-04-12 Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tsujita, Yushi Sofue, Keitaro Ueshima, Eisuke Ueno, Yoshiko Hori, Masatoshi Tsurusaki, Masakatsu Murakami, Takamichi Magn Reson Med Sci Review The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still on the rise in North America and Europe and is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The treatment of HCC varies, with surgery and locoregional therapy (LRT) such as radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and radiation therapy being the primary treatment. Currently, systemic therapy with molecular-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is becoming a major treatment option for the unresectable HCC. As the HCC after LRT or systemic therapy often remains unchanged in size and shows loss of contrast effect in contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria, which are usually used to evaluate the treatment response of solid tumors, are not appropriate for HCC. The modified RECIST (mRECIST) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria were developed for HCC, with a focus on viable lesions. The latest 2018 edition of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) also includes a section on the evaluation of treatment response. The cancer microenvironment influences the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs. Several studies have examined the utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting the pathological and molecular genetic patterns of HCC. In the future, it may be possible to stratify prognosis and predict treatment response prior to systemic therapy by using pre-treatment imaging findings. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10086401/ /pubmed/36792205 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2022-0118 Text en ©2023 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Review Tsujita, Yushi Sofue, Keitaro Ueshima, Eisuke Ueno, Yoshiko Hori, Masatoshi Tsurusaki, Masakatsu Murakami, Takamichi Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | Evaluation and Prediction of Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | evaluation and prediction of treatment response for hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792205 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2022-0118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsujitayushi evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sofuekeitaro evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT ueshimaeisuke evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT uenoyoshiko evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT horimasatoshi evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT tsurusakimasakatsu evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT murakamitakamichi evaluationandpredictionoftreatmentresponseforhepatocellularcarcinoma |