Cargando…

Differentiation of malignant from benign pleural effusions based on artificial intelligence

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to construct artificial intelligence models based on thoracic CT images to perform segmentation and classification of benign pleural effusion (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: A total of 918 patients with pleural effusion were initially included, wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Sufei, Tan, Xueyun, Li, Piqiang, Fan, Qianqian, Xia, Hui, Tian, Shan, Pan, Feng, Zhan, Na, Yu, Rong, Zhang, Liang, Duan, Yanran, Xu, Juanjuan, Ma, Yanling, Chen, Wenjuan, Li, Yan, Zhao, Zilin, Liu, Chaoyang, Bao, Qingjia, Yang, Lian, Jin, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-218581
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to construct artificial intelligence models based on thoracic CT images to perform segmentation and classification of benign pleural effusion (BPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: A total of 918 patients with pleural effusion were initially included, with 607 randomly selected cases used as the training cohort and the other 311 as the internal testing cohort; another independent external testing cohort with 362 cases was used. We developed a pleural effusion segmentation model (M1) by combining 3D spatially weighted U-Net with 2D classical U-Net. Then, a classification model (M2) was built to identify BPE and MPE using a CT volume and its 3D pleural effusion mask as inputs. RESULTS: The average Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard coefficient, precision, sensitivity, Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95) and average surface distance indicators in M1 were 87.6±5.0%, 82.2±6.2%, 99.0±1.0%, 83.0±6.6%, 6.9±3.8 and 1.6±1.1, respectively, which were better than those of the 3D U-Net and 3D spatially weighted U-Net. Regarding M2, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity obtained with volume concat masks as input were 0.842 (95% CI 0.801 to 0.878), 89.4% (95% CI 84.4% to 93.2%) and 65.1% (95% CI 57.3% to 72.3%) in the external testing cohort. These performance metrics were significantly improved compared with those for the other input patterns. CONCLUSIONS: We applied a deep learning model to the segmentation of pleural effusions, and the model showed encouraging performance in the differential diagnosis of BPE and MPE.