Cargando…

Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons

The ability of birds to fly through cluttered environments has inspired biologists interested in understanding its underlying mechanisms, and engineers interested in applying its underpinning principles. To analyse this problem empirically, we break it down into two distinct, but related, questions:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia, Taylor, Graham K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.244215
_version_ 1785022176172179456
author Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia
Taylor, Graham K.
author_facet Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia
Taylor, Graham K.
author_sort Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia
collection PubMed
description The ability of birds to fly through cluttered environments has inspired biologists interested in understanding its underlying mechanisms, and engineers interested in applying its underpinning principles. To analyse this problem empirically, we break it down into two distinct, but related, questions: How do birds select which gaps to aim for? And how do they steer through them? We answered these questions using a combined experimental and modelling approach, in which we released pigeons (Columbia livia domestica) inside a large hall with an open exit separated from the release point by a curtain creating two vertical gaps – one of which was obstructed by an obstacle. We tracked the birds using a high-speed motion capture system, and found that their gap choice seemed to be biased by their intrinsic handedness, rather than determined by extrinsic cues such as the size of the gap or its alignment with the destination. We modelled the pigeons' steering behaviour algorithmically by simulating their flight trajectories under a set of six candidate guidance laws, including those used previously to model target-oriented flight behaviours in birds. We found that their flights were best modelled by delayed proportional navigation commanding turning in proportion to the angular rate of the line-of-sight from the pigeon to the midpoint of the gap. Our results are consistent with this being a two-phase behaviour, in which the pigeon heads forward from the release point before steering towards the midpoint of whichever gap it chooses to aim for under closed-loop guidance. Our findings have implications for the sensorimotor mechanisms that underlie clutter negotiation in birds, uniting this with other kinds of target-oriented behaviours including aerial pursuit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10086542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100865422023-04-12 Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia Taylor, Graham K. J Exp Biol Research Article The ability of birds to fly through cluttered environments has inspired biologists interested in understanding its underlying mechanisms, and engineers interested in applying its underpinning principles. To analyse this problem empirically, we break it down into two distinct, but related, questions: How do birds select which gaps to aim for? And how do they steer through them? We answered these questions using a combined experimental and modelling approach, in which we released pigeons (Columbia livia domestica) inside a large hall with an open exit separated from the release point by a curtain creating two vertical gaps – one of which was obstructed by an obstacle. We tracked the birds using a high-speed motion capture system, and found that their gap choice seemed to be biased by their intrinsic handedness, rather than determined by extrinsic cues such as the size of the gap or its alignment with the destination. We modelled the pigeons' steering behaviour algorithmically by simulating their flight trajectories under a set of six candidate guidance laws, including those used previously to model target-oriented flight behaviours in birds. We found that their flights were best modelled by delayed proportional navigation commanding turning in proportion to the angular rate of the line-of-sight from the pigeon to the midpoint of the gap. Our results are consistent with this being a two-phase behaviour, in which the pigeon heads forward from the release point before steering towards the midpoint of whichever gap it chooses to aim for under closed-loop guidance. Our findings have implications for the sensorimotor mechanisms that underlie clutter negotiation in birds, uniting this with other kinds of target-oriented behaviours including aerial pursuit. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10086542/ /pubmed/36576032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.244215 Text en © 2023. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pérez-Campanero Antolín, Natalia
Taylor, Graham K.
Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title_full Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title_fullStr Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title_full_unstemmed Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title_short Gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
title_sort gap selection and steering during obstacle avoidance in pigeons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.244215
work_keys_str_mv AT perezcampaneroantolinnatalia gapselectionandsteeringduringobstacleavoidanceinpigeons
AT taylorgrahamk gapselectionandsteeringduringobstacleavoidanceinpigeons