The role of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection in patients with T1–T2 cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether prophylactic central compartment neck dissection (pCCND) is necessary in cases of stage T1–T2 cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Some studies have demonstrated the benefits of pCCND on oncologic outcomes, whereas others reported that any advantages were insignificant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pCCND on cancer recurrence and its pattern in patients with T1–T2 cN0 PTC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2,902 patients with PTC who had undergone thyroidectomy between 2006 and 2012 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital: 2,099 patients had undergone pCCND and thyroidectomy (pCCND group), whereas 803 did not undergo pCCND (non-pCCND group). We investigated the effects of pCCND on cancer recurrence by comparing these two groups. Recurrence was classified according to the location of the recurrence. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 112 months. The mean patient age was significantly younger in the pCCND group than in the non-pCCND group. There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of sex, tumor size, or thyroidectomy extension between the groups. In the pCCND group, 883 (42%) patients showed evidence of N1a disease, and the mean number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1.26±2.2. Recurrence occurred in 67 (2.3%) patients in the total cohort. Recurrence was observed in 20 (2.5%) and 47 (2.2%) patients in the non-pCCND and pCCND groups, respectively, but there were no significant differences between the groups (P=0.687). When analyzed by the site of recurrence, 50% and 4.3% of recurrent disease in the non-pCCND and pCCND groups, respectively, occurred in the central compartment (P<0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in recurrent disease at other sites. The 15-year cumulative central compartment recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of patients in the non-pCCND and pCCND groups were 99% and 100%, respectively (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, not performing pCCND was the only independent risk factor related to central compartment RFS, and the hazard ratio was 13.362 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.928–60.986; P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The omission of pCCND was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrence in the central compartment in patients with T1–T2 cN0 PTC.