Cargando…

Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study

AIMS: To estimate the effect of recreational legalization on cannabis use frequency and sources of variance across legal environments. DESIGN: Longitudinal discordant twin and gene–environment interaction models in twins recruited from birth records and assessed prospectively. SETTING: The United St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zellers, Stephanie M., Ross, J. Megan, Saunders, Gretchen R. B., Ellingson, Jarrod M., Anderson, Jacob E., Corley, Robin P., Iacono, William, Hewitt, John K., Hopfer, Christian J., McGue, Matt K., Vrieze, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16016
_version_ 1785022237170991104
author Zellers, Stephanie M.
Ross, J. Megan
Saunders, Gretchen R. B.
Ellingson, Jarrod M.
Anderson, Jacob E.
Corley, Robin P.
Iacono, William
Hewitt, John K.
Hopfer, Christian J.
McGue, Matt K.
Vrieze, Scott
author_facet Zellers, Stephanie M.
Ross, J. Megan
Saunders, Gretchen R. B.
Ellingson, Jarrod M.
Anderson, Jacob E.
Corley, Robin P.
Iacono, William
Hewitt, John K.
Hopfer, Christian J.
McGue, Matt K.
Vrieze, Scott
author_sort Zellers, Stephanie M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To estimate the effect of recreational legalization on cannabis use frequency and sources of variance across legal environments. DESIGN: Longitudinal discordant twin and gene–environment interaction models in twins recruited from birth records and assessed prospectively. SETTING: The United States, including states with different recreational cannabis policies before and after 2014, when recreational cannabis was first legalized. PARTICIPANTS: Two longitudinal, prospectively assessed samples of American twins aged 24–47 (n = 1425 in legal states, n = 1996 in illegal states), including 111 monozygotic pairs discordant for residence. MEASUREMENTS: Current cannabis use frequency (measured continuously and ordinally) was the primary outcome, and the predictor was recreational status of cannabis (legal/illegal) in the participant’s state of residence at the time of assessment. Covariates include age, sex and cannabis use frequency prior to 2014. FINDINGS: Accounting for pre‐2014 use, residents of legal states used cannabis more frequently than residents of illegal states (b = 0.21, P = 8.08 × 10(−5)). Comparing 111 pairs of monozygotic twins discordant for residence confirmed the effect (b = 0.18, P = 0.014). There was inconclusive evidence for genetic influences on cannabis use frequency that were specific to the legal environment [χ(2) = 2.9 × 10(−9), degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 1, P > 0.999]. Existing genetic influences were moderated by the legal environment, as the genetic correlation between marijuana use before and after legalization was lower in states that legalized (r ( genetic ) = 0.24) compared with states that did not (r ( genetic ) = 0.78, P ( difference ) = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, there appears to be a ~ 20% average increase in cannabis use frequency attributable to recreational legalization, consistent across increasingly rigorous designs. In addition, the heritability of cannabis use frequency appears to be moderated by legalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10086942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100869422023-04-12 Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study Zellers, Stephanie M. Ross, J. Megan Saunders, Gretchen R. B. Ellingson, Jarrod M. Anderson, Jacob E. Corley, Robin P. Iacono, William Hewitt, John K. Hopfer, Christian J. McGue, Matt K. Vrieze, Scott Addiction Research Reports AIMS: To estimate the effect of recreational legalization on cannabis use frequency and sources of variance across legal environments. DESIGN: Longitudinal discordant twin and gene–environment interaction models in twins recruited from birth records and assessed prospectively. SETTING: The United States, including states with different recreational cannabis policies before and after 2014, when recreational cannabis was first legalized. PARTICIPANTS: Two longitudinal, prospectively assessed samples of American twins aged 24–47 (n = 1425 in legal states, n = 1996 in illegal states), including 111 monozygotic pairs discordant for residence. MEASUREMENTS: Current cannabis use frequency (measured continuously and ordinally) was the primary outcome, and the predictor was recreational status of cannabis (legal/illegal) in the participant’s state of residence at the time of assessment. Covariates include age, sex and cannabis use frequency prior to 2014. FINDINGS: Accounting for pre‐2014 use, residents of legal states used cannabis more frequently than residents of illegal states (b = 0.21, P = 8.08 × 10(−5)). Comparing 111 pairs of monozygotic twins discordant for residence confirmed the effect (b = 0.18, P = 0.014). There was inconclusive evidence for genetic influences on cannabis use frequency that were specific to the legal environment [χ(2) = 2.9 × 10(−9), degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 1, P > 0.999]. Existing genetic influences were moderated by the legal environment, as the genetic correlation between marijuana use before and after legalization was lower in states that legalized (r ( genetic ) = 0.24) compared with states that did not (r ( genetic ) = 0.78, P ( difference ) = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, there appears to be a ~ 20% average increase in cannabis use frequency attributable to recreational legalization, consistent across increasingly rigorous designs. In addition, the heritability of cannabis use frequency appears to be moderated by legalization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-24 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10086942/ /pubmed/36002928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16016 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Zellers, Stephanie M.
Ross, J. Megan
Saunders, Gretchen R. B.
Ellingson, Jarrod M.
Anderson, Jacob E.
Corley, Robin P.
Iacono, William
Hewitt, John K.
Hopfer, Christian J.
McGue, Matt K.
Vrieze, Scott
Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title_full Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title_fullStr Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title_short Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
title_sort impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16016
work_keys_str_mv AT zellersstephaniem impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT rossjmegan impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT saundersgretchenrb impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT ellingsonjarrodm impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT andersonjacobe impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT corleyrobinp impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT iaconowilliam impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT hewittjohnk impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT hopferchristianj impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT mcguemattk impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy
AT vriezescott impactsofrecreationalcannabislegalizationoncannabisusealongitudinaldiscordanttwinstudy