Cargando…

Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Given the avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) disease burden in poultry worldwide and the evidence of a possible role played by wild birds in the virus epidemiology, the present study summarizes aMPV serological and molecular data on free‐ranging avifauna available in the literature by conducting a systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graziosi, Giulia, Lupini, Caterina, Catelli, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14680
_version_ 1785022239345737728
author Graziosi, Giulia
Lupini, Caterina
Catelli, Elena
author_facet Graziosi, Giulia
Lupini, Caterina
Catelli, Elena
author_sort Graziosi, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Given the avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) disease burden in poultry worldwide and the evidence of a possible role played by wild birds in the virus epidemiology, the present study summarizes aMPV serological and molecular data on free‐ranging avifauna available in the literature by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis. A computerized literature research was performed on PubMed, Scopus, CAB Direct and Web of Science to identify relevant publications across the period 1990–2021, along with the screening of reference lists. A random‐effect model was applied to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index statistic (I (2)) was applied to assess between‐study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses for molecular studies only were performed according to geographical area of samplings, taxonomic order, genus and migration patterns of the birds surveyed. A total of 11 publications on molecular surveys and 6 on serological ones were retained for analysis. The pooled molecular prevalence was 6% (95% CI: 1–13%) and a high between‐study heterogeneity was detected (I (2) = 96%, p < .01). Moderator analyses showed statistically significant differences according to geographical area studied, taxonomic order and genus. Concerning serological prevalence, a pooled estimate of 14% (95% CI: 1–39%), along with a high between‐study heterogeneity, was obtained (I (2) = 98%, p < .01). Moderator analysis was not performed due to the scarcity of eligible serological studies included. Overall, molecular and serological evidence suggests that some wild bird taxa could play a role in aMPV epidemiology. Particularly, wild ducks, geese, gulls and pheasants, according to scientific contributions hereby considered, proved to be susceptible to aMPV, and due to host ecology, may act as a viral carrier or reservoir. Further surveys of wild birds are encouraged for a better comprehension of the poultry/wild bird interface in aMPV epidemiology and for better characterizing the virus host breadth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10086952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100869522023-04-12 Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Graziosi, Giulia Lupini, Caterina Catelli, Elena Transbound Emerg Dis Original Articles Given the avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) disease burden in poultry worldwide and the evidence of a possible role played by wild birds in the virus epidemiology, the present study summarizes aMPV serological and molecular data on free‐ranging avifauna available in the literature by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis. A computerized literature research was performed on PubMed, Scopus, CAB Direct and Web of Science to identify relevant publications across the period 1990–2021, along with the screening of reference lists. A random‐effect model was applied to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index statistic (I (2)) was applied to assess between‐study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses for molecular studies only were performed according to geographical area of samplings, taxonomic order, genus and migration patterns of the birds surveyed. A total of 11 publications on molecular surveys and 6 on serological ones were retained for analysis. The pooled molecular prevalence was 6% (95% CI: 1–13%) and a high between‐study heterogeneity was detected (I (2) = 96%, p < .01). Moderator analyses showed statistically significant differences according to geographical area studied, taxonomic order and genus. Concerning serological prevalence, a pooled estimate of 14% (95% CI: 1–39%), along with a high between‐study heterogeneity, was obtained (I (2) = 98%, p < .01). Moderator analysis was not performed due to the scarcity of eligible serological studies included. Overall, molecular and serological evidence suggests that some wild bird taxa could play a role in aMPV epidemiology. Particularly, wild ducks, geese, gulls and pheasants, according to scientific contributions hereby considered, proved to be susceptible to aMPV, and due to host ecology, may act as a viral carrier or reservoir. Further surveys of wild birds are encouraged for a better comprehension of the poultry/wild bird interface in aMPV epidemiology and for better characterizing the virus host breadth. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-22 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10086952/ /pubmed/35960706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14680 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Graziosi, Giulia
Lupini, Caterina
Catelli, Elena
Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (ampv) epidemiology: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14680
work_keys_str_mv AT graziosigiulia disentanglingtheroleofwildbirdsinavianmetapneumovirusampvepidemiologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lupinicaterina disentanglingtheroleofwildbirdsinavianmetapneumovirusampvepidemiologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT catellielena disentanglingtheroleofwildbirdsinavianmetapneumovirusampvepidemiologyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis