Cargando…

Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas

Performance thresholds are an important tool for determining successful conservation outcomes. They provide an objective means of defining good ecological condition and have been endorsed as an essential part of best practice in protected area (PA) management within the International Union for the C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilton, Mairi, Cook, Carly N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13963
_version_ 1785022284527828992
author Hilton, Mairi
Cook, Carly N.
author_facet Hilton, Mairi
Cook, Carly N.
author_sort Hilton, Mairi
collection PubMed
description Performance thresholds are an important tool for determining successful conservation outcomes. They provide an objective means of defining good ecological condition and have been endorsed as an essential part of best practice in protected area (PA) management within the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas Standard. With a growing number of PAs attaining Green List status globally, thresholds developed by PAs on the Green List present an excellent resource with which to identify the attributes of well‐defined performance thresholds. We examined 349 thresholds associated with PAs on the Green List to determine whether they were specific and measurable (i.e., factors recognized as essential for setting well‐defined targets). We assessed whether thresholds were defined quantitatively and whether definitions included ambiguous terms (e.g., stable numbers). We identified six different ways thresholds were expressed and found that many thresholds were expressed as management objectives, rather than ecological condition thresholds, although this trend improved over time. Approximately one‐half of the performance thresholds lacked the necessary specificity to delineate successful outcomes. Our results enabled us to develop a checklist of information required to set robust performance thresholds. Recommendations include that thresholds should be quantitatively defined, including quantitative estimates of the limits of acceptable change (LAC) around the target condition. To ensure transparency, a rationale and associated evidence should be provided to support the threshold and the LAC. When accompanied by a rationale and quantitative estimate of the current condition of the value, unambiguously defined thresholds with a quantitative LAC provide an objective means of demonstrating that successful conservation outcomes have been achieved. These recommendations will help conservation managers apply the Green List Standard and improve the measurement of conservation outcomes more broadly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100871652023-04-12 Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas Hilton, Mairi Cook, Carly N. Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Performance thresholds are an important tool for determining successful conservation outcomes. They provide an objective means of defining good ecological condition and have been endorsed as an essential part of best practice in protected area (PA) management within the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas Standard. With a growing number of PAs attaining Green List status globally, thresholds developed by PAs on the Green List present an excellent resource with which to identify the attributes of well‐defined performance thresholds. We examined 349 thresholds associated with PAs on the Green List to determine whether they were specific and measurable (i.e., factors recognized as essential for setting well‐defined targets). We assessed whether thresholds were defined quantitatively and whether definitions included ambiguous terms (e.g., stable numbers). We identified six different ways thresholds were expressed and found that many thresholds were expressed as management objectives, rather than ecological condition thresholds, although this trend improved over time. Approximately one‐half of the performance thresholds lacked the necessary specificity to delineate successful outcomes. Our results enabled us to develop a checklist of information required to set robust performance thresholds. Recommendations include that thresholds should be quantitatively defined, including quantitative estimates of the limits of acceptable change (LAC) around the target condition. To ensure transparency, a rationale and associated evidence should be provided to support the threshold and the LAC. When accompanied by a rationale and quantitative estimate of the current condition of the value, unambiguously defined thresholds with a quantitative LAC provide an objective means of demonstrating that successful conservation outcomes have been achieved. These recommendations will help conservation managers apply the Green List Standard and improve the measurement of conservation outcomes more broadly. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087165/ /pubmed/35661263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13963 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Hilton, Mairi
Cook, Carly N.
Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title_full Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title_fullStr Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title_full_unstemmed Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title_short Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
title_sort defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13963
work_keys_str_mv AT hiltonmairi definingperformancethresholdsforeffectivemanagementofbiodiversitywithinprotectedareas
AT cookcarlyn definingperformancethresholdsforeffectivemanagementofbiodiversitywithinprotectedareas