Cargando…

Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples

Indigenous communities at the front lines of climate change and biodiversity loss are increasingly shaping the conservation of lands, waters, and species. The Arctic is a hotbed for emerging local, national, and international conservation efforts, and researchers, managers, and communities alike wil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13972
_version_ 1785022314705846272
author Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq
author_facet Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq
author_sort Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq
collection PubMed
description Indigenous communities at the front lines of climate change and biodiversity loss are increasingly shaping the conservation of lands, waters, and species. The Arctic is a hotbed for emerging local, national, and international conservation efforts, and researchers, managers, and communities alike will benefit from a framework that improves approaches to Indigenous partnerships. Co‐productive conservation is a framework that encompasses both the co‐production of knowledge and the co‐production of public services to pursue ethically conscious, culturally relevant, and fully knowledge‐based approaches to biodiversity concerns. Co‐productive conservation recognizes that conservation can be practiced in a way that embodies Indigenous perspectives, knowledge, rights, priorities, and livelihoods. Six iterative and reflexive co‐production processes (i.e., co‐planning, co‐prioritizing, co‐learning, co‐managing, co‐delivering, and co‐assessing) focus on the human dimensions that allow research, management, and conservation to affect change. By opening discussions on how to structure conservation efforts in partnership with Indigenous communities, the conservation community can move away from narratives that perceive Indigenous participation as an obligation or part of an ethical narrative and instead embrace a process that broadens the evidence base and situates conservation within Indigenous contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100873012023-04-12 Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq Conserv Biol Conservation Practice and Policy Indigenous communities at the front lines of climate change and biodiversity loss are increasingly shaping the conservation of lands, waters, and species. The Arctic is a hotbed for emerging local, national, and international conservation efforts, and researchers, managers, and communities alike will benefit from a framework that improves approaches to Indigenous partnerships. Co‐productive conservation is a framework that encompasses both the co‐production of knowledge and the co‐production of public services to pursue ethically conscious, culturally relevant, and fully knowledge‐based approaches to biodiversity concerns. Co‐productive conservation recognizes that conservation can be practiced in a way that embodies Indigenous perspectives, knowledge, rights, priorities, and livelihoods. Six iterative and reflexive co‐production processes (i.e., co‐planning, co‐prioritizing, co‐learning, co‐managing, co‐delivering, and co‐assessing) focus on the human dimensions that allow research, management, and conservation to affect change. By opening discussions on how to structure conservation efforts in partnership with Indigenous communities, the conservation community can move away from narratives that perceive Indigenous participation as an obligation or part of an ethical narrative and instead embrace a process that broadens the evidence base and situates conservation within Indigenous contexts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-31 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087301/ /pubmed/35775098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13972 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Conservation Practice and Policy
Buschman, Victoria Qutuuq
Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title_full Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title_fullStr Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title_full_unstemmed Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title_short Framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with Arctic Indigenous peoples
title_sort framing co‐productive conservation in partnership with arctic indigenous peoples
topic Conservation Practice and Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13972
work_keys_str_mv AT buschmanvictoriaqutuuq framingcoproductiveconservationinpartnershipwitharcticindigenouspeoples