Cargando…

Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis has been reported among workers exposed to epoxy components. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of skin sensitization and dermatitis among workers exposed to epoxy components during production of wind turbine blades while using compreh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christiansen, Alexandra G., Carstensen, Ole, Sommerlund, Mette, Clausen, Per A., Bønløkke, Jakob H., Schlünssen, Vivi, Isaksson, Marléne, Schmidt, Sigrun A. J., Kolstad, Henrik A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21830
_version_ 1785022322386665472
author Christiansen, Alexandra G.
Carstensen, Ole
Sommerlund, Mette
Clausen, Per A.
Bønløkke, Jakob H.
Schlünssen, Vivi
Isaksson, Marléne
Schmidt, Sigrun A. J.
Kolstad, Henrik A.
author_facet Christiansen, Alexandra G.
Carstensen, Ole
Sommerlund, Mette
Clausen, Per A.
Bønløkke, Jakob H.
Schlünssen, Vivi
Isaksson, Marléne
Schmidt, Sigrun A. J.
Kolstad, Henrik A.
author_sort Christiansen, Alexandra G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis has been reported among workers exposed to epoxy components. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of skin sensitization and dermatitis among workers exposed to epoxy components during production of wind turbine blades while using comprehensive safety measures. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study of 180 highly epoxy‐exposed production workers and 41 nonexposed office workers was conducted at two wind turbine blade factories in Denmark. Participants underwent a skin examination, were tested with a tailored patch test panel including epoxy‐containing products used at the factories, and answered a questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixteen production workers (8·9%) were sensitized to an epoxy component compared with none of the office workers. Skin sensitization was more frequent within the first year of exposed employment. Strong selection bias by atopic status was indicated. Among nonatopic workers, the prevalence of dermatitis was higher among production workers (16·4%) than among office workers [6·5%, odds ratio (OR) 2·3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·6–9·1] and higher among the sensitized workers (43·8%) than the nonsensitized workers (14·6%, OR 4·5, 95% CI 1·6–12·7). Resins based on diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A and F were the most frequent sensitizers. One of the four workers sensitized to epoxy components used at the factories did not react to the epoxy resin of the TRUE test(®) panel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comprehensive skin protection, sensitization and dermatitis are prevalent among highly epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry in Denmark. Our findings document the need for intensified preventive efforts and emphasize the importance of tailored patch testing. What is already known about this topic? Epoxy components are well‐known sensitizers of the skin. A high prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis has been reported among workers exposed to epoxy components. Comprehensive protective equipment is recommended when working with epoxy components. What does this study add? Despite comprehensive skin protection, skin sensitization and dermatitis are prevalent among epoxy‐exposed workers. We found that 40% of workers sensitized to epoxy products had dermatitis. Only 75% of the sensitized workers were detected by the epoxy resin of the TRUE test(®), which emphasizes the importance of tailored testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100873352023-04-12 Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry Christiansen, Alexandra G. Carstensen, Ole Sommerlund, Mette Clausen, Per A. Bønløkke, Jakob H. Schlünssen, Vivi Isaksson, Marléne Schmidt, Sigrun A. J. Kolstad, Henrik A. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis has been reported among workers exposed to epoxy components. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of skin sensitization and dermatitis among workers exposed to epoxy components during production of wind turbine blades while using comprehensive safety measures. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study of 180 highly epoxy‐exposed production workers and 41 nonexposed office workers was conducted at two wind turbine blade factories in Denmark. Participants underwent a skin examination, were tested with a tailored patch test panel including epoxy‐containing products used at the factories, and answered a questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixteen production workers (8·9%) were sensitized to an epoxy component compared with none of the office workers. Skin sensitization was more frequent within the first year of exposed employment. Strong selection bias by atopic status was indicated. Among nonatopic workers, the prevalence of dermatitis was higher among production workers (16·4%) than among office workers [6·5%, odds ratio (OR) 2·3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·6–9·1] and higher among the sensitized workers (43·8%) than the nonsensitized workers (14·6%, OR 4·5, 95% CI 1·6–12·7). Resins based on diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A and F were the most frequent sensitizers. One of the four workers sensitized to epoxy components used at the factories did not react to the epoxy resin of the TRUE test(®) panel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comprehensive skin protection, sensitization and dermatitis are prevalent among highly epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry in Denmark. Our findings document the need for intensified preventive efforts and emphasize the importance of tailored patch testing. What is already known about this topic? Epoxy components are well‐known sensitizers of the skin. A high prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis has been reported among workers exposed to epoxy components. Comprehensive protective equipment is recommended when working with epoxy components. What does this study add? Despite comprehensive skin protection, skin sensitization and dermatitis are prevalent among epoxy‐exposed workers. We found that 40% of workers sensitized to epoxy products had dermatitis. Only 75% of the sensitized workers were detected by the epoxy resin of the TRUE test(®), which emphasizes the importance of tailored testing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087335/ /pubmed/35972390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21830 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Christiansen, Alexandra G.
Carstensen, Ole
Sommerlund, Mette
Clausen, Per A.
Bønløkke, Jakob H.
Schlünssen, Vivi
Isaksson, Marléne
Schmidt, Sigrun A. J.
Kolstad, Henrik A.
Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title_full Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title_fullStr Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title_short Prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
title_sort prevalence of skin sensitization and dermatitis among epoxy‐exposed workers in the wind turbine industry
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21830
work_keys_str_mv AT christiansenalexandrag prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT carstensenole prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT sommerlundmette prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT clausenpera prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT bønløkkejakobh prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT schlunssenvivi prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT isakssonmarlene prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT schmidtsigrunaj prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry
AT kolstadhenrika prevalenceofskinsensitizationanddermatitisamongepoxyexposedworkersinthewindturbineindustry