Cargando…
UNOS policy change benefits high‐priority patients without harming those at low priority
The heart transplantation policy change (PC) has improved outcomes in high‐acuity (Old 1A, New 1–3) patients, but the effect on low‐priority (Old 1B/2, New 4–6) patients is unknown. We sought to determine if low‐priority patient outcomes were compromised by benefits to high‐priority patients by eval...
Autores principales: | Wolfson, Aaron M., DePasquale, Eugene C., Fong, Michael W., Pandya, Kruti, Zhou, Leon, Kawaguchi, Eric S., Thomas, Sunu S., Vaidya, Ajay S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17173 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quantitative benefit–harm assessment for setting research priorities: the example of roflumilast for patients with COPD
por: Puhan, Milo A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Setting Priorities: Yourself, Those Close to you, Your Patients
por: Hupp, James R.
Publicado: (2021) -
Science and technology policy: priorities of governments
por: Tisdell, C A
Publicado: (1981) -
Health Policy Priorities for the Biden Administration
por: Japinga, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Telerehabilitation Policy Report: Interprofessional Policy Principles and Priorities
por: Terrell, Evelyn Abrahante, et al.
Publicado: (2021)