Cargando…

Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens

As cities expand, understanding how urbanization affects biodiversity is a key ecological goal. Yet, little is known about how host‐associated microbial diversity responds to urbanization. We asked whether communities of microbial (bacterial and fungal) in floral nectar and sugar‐water feeders and v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donald, Marion L., Galbraith, Josie A., Erastova, Daria A., Podolyan, Anastasija, Miller, Tom E. X., Dhami, Manpreet K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16159
_version_ 1785022338525298688
author Donald, Marion L.
Galbraith, Josie A.
Erastova, Daria A.
Podolyan, Anastasija
Miller, Tom E. X.
Dhami, Manpreet K.
author_facet Donald, Marion L.
Galbraith, Josie A.
Erastova, Daria A.
Podolyan, Anastasija
Miller, Tom E. X.
Dhami, Manpreet K.
author_sort Donald, Marion L.
collection PubMed
description As cities expand, understanding how urbanization affects biodiversity is a key ecological goal. Yet, little is known about how host‐associated microbial diversity responds to urbanization. We asked whether communities of microbial (bacterial and fungal) in floral nectar and sugar‐water feeders and vectored by nectar‐feeding birds—thus forming a metacommunity—differed in composition and diversity between suburban and rural gardens. Compared to rural birds, we found that suburban birds vectored different and more diverse bacterial communities. These differences were not detected in the nectar of common plant species, suggesting that nectar filters microbial taxa and results in metacommunity convergence. However, when considering all the nectar sources present, suburban beta diversity was elevated compared to rural beta diversity due to turnover of bacterial taxa across a plant species and sugar‐water feeders. While fungal metacommunity composition and beta diversity in nectar were similar between suburban and rural sites, alpha diversity was elevated in suburban sites, which mirrored the trend of increased fungal alpha diversity on birds. These results emphasize the interdependence of host, vector, and microbial diversity and demonstrate that human decisions can shape nectar microbial diversity in contrasting ways for bacteria and fungi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100874012023-04-12 Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens Donald, Marion L. Galbraith, Josie A. Erastova, Daria A. Podolyan, Anastasija Miller, Tom E. X. Dhami, Manpreet K. Environ Microbiol Research Articles As cities expand, understanding how urbanization affects biodiversity is a key ecological goal. Yet, little is known about how host‐associated microbial diversity responds to urbanization. We asked whether communities of microbial (bacterial and fungal) in floral nectar and sugar‐water feeders and vectored by nectar‐feeding birds—thus forming a metacommunity—differed in composition and diversity between suburban and rural gardens. Compared to rural birds, we found that suburban birds vectored different and more diverse bacterial communities. These differences were not detected in the nectar of common plant species, suggesting that nectar filters microbial taxa and results in metacommunity convergence. However, when considering all the nectar sources present, suburban beta diversity was elevated compared to rural beta diversity due to turnover of bacterial taxa across a plant species and sugar‐water feeders. While fungal metacommunity composition and beta diversity in nectar were similar between suburban and rural sites, alpha diversity was elevated in suburban sites, which mirrored the trend of increased fungal alpha diversity on birds. These results emphasize the interdependence of host, vector, and microbial diversity and demonstrate that human decisions can shape nectar microbial diversity in contrasting ways for bacteria and fungi. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-09-14 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087401/ /pubmed/36102191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16159 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Donald, Marion L.
Galbraith, Josie A.
Erastova, Daria A.
Podolyan, Anastasija
Miller, Tom E. X.
Dhami, Manpreet K.
Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title_full Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title_fullStr Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title_full_unstemmed Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title_short Nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
title_sort nectar resources affect bird‐dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16159
work_keys_str_mv AT donaldmarionl nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens
AT galbraithjosiea nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens
AT erastovadariaa nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens
AT podolyananastasija nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens
AT millertomex nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens
AT dhamimanpreetk nectarresourcesaffectbirddispersedmicrobialmetacommunitiesinsuburbanandruralgardens