Cargando…

The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women

INTRODUCTION: Coital incontinence (CI) is a frequent problem in women with urinary incontinence (UI) with significant impact on female sexuality and quality of life. The underlying mechanism is controversial; it has been known that CI is associated with both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra, Seval, Mehmet Murat, Varlı, Bulut, Dökmeci, Fulya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1160637
_version_ 1785022367360090112
author Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra
Seval, Mehmet Murat
Varlı, Bulut
Dökmeci, Fulya
author_facet Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra
Seval, Mehmet Murat
Varlı, Bulut
Dökmeci, Fulya
author_sort Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Coital incontinence (CI) is a frequent problem in women with urinary incontinence (UI) with significant impact on female sexuality and quality of life. The underlying mechanism is controversial; it has been known that CI is associated with both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and detrusor overactivity (DO). However, recently it has been reported that CI is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with DO. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) has been shown to be a sensitive tool for the detection of DO. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical risk factors for CI and the association of CI with urodynamic diagnoses at single voiding cycle AUM. METHODS: Records of sexually active women with urinary incontinence attending the urogynaecology unit of a university hospital, who completed the PISQ-12 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 1,005). Patients were grouped using the 6th question; patients answering “never” to this question were considered as continent during coitus (n = 591) and patients reporting any urinary leakage at coitus were considered to have CI (n = 414). Demographics, clinical examination findings, incontinence severity measured by the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index, scores of Turkish validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, IIQ-7, OAB-V8, and PISQ-12) and single voiding cycle AUM findings were compared, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among all sexually active women with UI, 41.2% had CI; UI was more severe, symptom bother was higher, related quality of life (p < 0.001) and sexual function were worse (≤0.018) in these women. Younger age (OR 0.967, p < 0.001), history of vaginal delivery (OR 2.127, p = 0.019), smoking (OR 1.490, p = 0.041), postural UI (OR 2.012, p = 0.001), positive cough stress test (OR 2.193, p < 0.001), and positive SEST (OR 1.756, p = 0.01) were found as independent clinical factors associated with CI. Urodynamic SUI (OR 2.168, p = 0.001) and MUI (OR 1.874, p = 0.002) were found as significant and independent urodynamic diagnoses associated with CI, whereas no association was found with DO or UUI. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and AUM findings supported that CI is a more severe form of UI that it is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with UUI or DO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100875232023-04-12 The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra Seval, Mehmet Murat Varlı, Bulut Dökmeci, Fulya Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Coital incontinence (CI) is a frequent problem in women with urinary incontinence (UI) with significant impact on female sexuality and quality of life. The underlying mechanism is controversial; it has been known that CI is associated with both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and detrusor overactivity (DO). However, recently it has been reported that CI is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with DO. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) has been shown to be a sensitive tool for the detection of DO. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical risk factors for CI and the association of CI with urodynamic diagnoses at single voiding cycle AUM. METHODS: Records of sexually active women with urinary incontinence attending the urogynaecology unit of a university hospital, who completed the PISQ-12 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 1,005). Patients were grouped using the 6th question; patients answering “never” to this question were considered as continent during coitus (n = 591) and patients reporting any urinary leakage at coitus were considered to have CI (n = 414). Demographics, clinical examination findings, incontinence severity measured by the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index, scores of Turkish validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, IIQ-7, OAB-V8, and PISQ-12) and single voiding cycle AUM findings were compared, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among all sexually active women with UI, 41.2% had CI; UI was more severe, symptom bother was higher, related quality of life (p < 0.001) and sexual function were worse (≤0.018) in these women. Younger age (OR 0.967, p < 0.001), history of vaginal delivery (OR 2.127, p = 0.019), smoking (OR 1.490, p = 0.041), postural UI (OR 2.012, p = 0.001), positive cough stress test (OR 2.193, p < 0.001), and positive SEST (OR 1.756, p = 0.01) were found as independent clinical factors associated with CI. Urodynamic SUI (OR 2.168, p = 0.001) and MUI (OR 1.874, p = 0.002) were found as significant and independent urodynamic diagnoses associated with CI, whereas no association was found with DO or UUI. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and AUM findings supported that CI is a more severe form of UI that it is mainly related with SUI and urethral incompetence, but not with UUI or DO. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10087523/ /pubmed/37056730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1160637 Text en Copyright © 2023 Çetinkaya, Seval, Varlı and Dökmeci. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Çetinkaya, Şerife Esra
Seval, Mehmet Murat
Varlı, Bulut
Dökmeci, Fulya
The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title_full The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title_fullStr The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title_full_unstemmed The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title_short The association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
title_sort association of coital incontinence with clinical factors and single voiding cycle ambulatory urodynamic monitoring findings in women
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1160637
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinkayaserifeesra theassociationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT sevalmehmetmurat theassociationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT varlıbulut theassociationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT dokmecifulya theassociationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT cetinkayaserifeesra associationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT sevalmehmetmurat associationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT varlıbulut associationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen
AT dokmecifulya associationofcoitalincontinencewithclinicalfactorsandsinglevoidingcycleambulatoryurodynamicmonitoringfindingsinwomen