Cargando…

Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant

Controversy exists as to whether, compared to young adults, older adults are more, equally or less likely to make linguistic predictions while reading. While previous studies have examined age effects on the prediction of upcoming words, the prediction of upcoming syntactic structures has been large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cutter, Michael G., Paterson, Kevin B., Filik, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12594
_version_ 1785022396368945152
author Cutter, Michael G.
Paterson, Kevin B.
Filik, Ruth
author_facet Cutter, Michael G.
Paterson, Kevin B.
Filik, Ruth
author_sort Cutter, Michael G.
collection PubMed
description Controversy exists as to whether, compared to young adults, older adults are more, equally or less likely to make linguistic predictions while reading. While previous studies have examined age effects on the prediction of upcoming words, the prediction of upcoming syntactic structures has been largely unexplored. We compared the benefit that young and older readers gain when the syntactic structure is made predictable, as well as potential age differences in the costs involved in making predictions. In a self‐paced reading study, 60 young and 60 older adults read sentences in which noun‐phrase coordination (e.g. large pizza or tasty calzone) is made predictable through the inclusion of the word either earlier in the sentence. Results showed a benefit of the presence of either in the second half of the coordination phrase, and a cost of the presence of either in the first half. We observed no age differences in the benefit or costs of making these predictions; Bayes factor analyses offered strong evidence that these effects are age invariant. Together, these findings suggest that both older and younger adults make similar strength syntactic predictions with a similar level of difficulty. We relate this age invariance in syntactic prediction to specific aspects of the ageing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100876472023-04-12 Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant Cutter, Michael G. Paterson, Kevin B. Filik, Ruth Br J Psychol Original Articles Controversy exists as to whether, compared to young adults, older adults are more, equally or less likely to make linguistic predictions while reading. While previous studies have examined age effects on the prediction of upcoming words, the prediction of upcoming syntactic structures has been largely unexplored. We compared the benefit that young and older readers gain when the syntactic structure is made predictable, as well as potential age differences in the costs involved in making predictions. In a self‐paced reading study, 60 young and 60 older adults read sentences in which noun‐phrase coordination (e.g. large pizza or tasty calzone) is made predictable through the inclusion of the word either earlier in the sentence. Results showed a benefit of the presence of either in the second half of the coordination phrase, and a cost of the presence of either in the first half. We observed no age differences in the benefit or costs of making these predictions; Bayes factor analyses offered strong evidence that these effects are age invariant. Together, these findings suggest that both older and younger adults make similar strength syntactic predictions with a similar level of difficulty. We relate this age invariance in syntactic prediction to specific aspects of the ageing process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-14 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10087647/ /pubmed/36102378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12594 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cutter, Michael G.
Paterson, Kevin B.
Filik, Ruth
Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title_full Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title_fullStr Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title_full_unstemmed Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title_short Syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
title_sort syntactic prediction during self‐paced reading is age invariant
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12594
work_keys_str_mv AT cuttermichaelg syntacticpredictionduringselfpacedreadingisageinvariant
AT patersonkevinb syntacticpredictionduringselfpacedreadingisageinvariant
AT filikruth syntacticpredictionduringselfpacedreadingisageinvariant