Cargando…

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair

BACKGROUND: Failure of a subscapularis repair construct after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can result in difficulty with internal rotation and an increased likelihood of dislocation. Although suture tape has been demonstrated to be an efficacious augment for tendonous repairs elsewhere in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellington, Ian J., Hewitt, Cory R., Hawthorne, Benjamin C., Mancini, Michael R., Dorsey, Caitlin G., Quintana, Julio O., Talamo, Michael, Obopilwe, Elifho, Cote, Mark P., Mazzocca, Augustus D., Sethi, Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231162361
_version_ 1785022398804787200
author Wellington, Ian J.
Hewitt, Cory R.
Hawthorne, Benjamin C.
Mancini, Michael R.
Dorsey, Caitlin G.
Quintana, Julio O.
Talamo, Michael
Obopilwe, Elifho
Cote, Mark P.
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Sethi, Paul M.
author_facet Wellington, Ian J.
Hewitt, Cory R.
Hawthorne, Benjamin C.
Mancini, Michael R.
Dorsey, Caitlin G.
Quintana, Julio O.
Talamo, Michael
Obopilwe, Elifho
Cote, Mark P.
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Sethi, Paul M.
author_sort Wellington, Ian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure of a subscapularis repair construct after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can result in difficulty with internal rotation and an increased likelihood of dislocation. Although suture tape has been demonstrated to be an efficacious augment for tendonous repairs elsewhere in the body, it has not been investigated as a method for augmenting subscapularis peel repairs. PURPOSE: To determine the biomechanical efficacy of suture tape augmentation for the repair of a subscapularis peel. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric shoulders underwent a subscapularis peel. Specimens were randomly split into 2 groups: 6 specimens underwent repair using a transosseous bone tunnel technique with 3 high-strength sutures placed with a Mason-Allen configuration (control group), and 6 specimens underwent the control repair using augmentation with 2 suture tapes placed in an inverted mattress fashion and secured to the proximal humerus using a suture anchor (augmentation group). Shoulders underwent biomechanical testing to compare repair displacement with cyclic loading, load at ultimate failure, and construct stiffness. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in displacement after cyclic loading at the superior (P = .87), middle (P = .47), or inferior (P = .77) portions of the subscapularis tendon. Load to failure was significantly greater in the augmentation group (585.1 ± 97.4 N) than in the control group (358.5 ± 81.8 N) (P = .001). Stiffness was also greater in the augmentation group (71.8 ± 13.7 N/mm) when compared with the control group (48.7 ± 5.7 N/mm) (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Subscapularis peel repair with augmentation via 2 inverted mattress suture tapes secured with an anchor in the proximal humerus conferred significantly greater load at ultimate failure and construct stiffness when compared with a traditional repair using 3 Mason-Allen sutures. There was no difference in repair displacement with cyclic loading between the repair groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture tape augmentation of subscapularis peel repairs after shoulder arthroplasty provides an effective segment to the strength of the repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100876572023-04-12 Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair Wellington, Ian J. Hewitt, Cory R. Hawthorne, Benjamin C. Mancini, Michael R. Dorsey, Caitlin G. Quintana, Julio O. Talamo, Michael Obopilwe, Elifho Cote, Mark P. Mazzocca, Augustus D. Sethi, Paul M. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Failure of a subscapularis repair construct after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can result in difficulty with internal rotation and an increased likelihood of dislocation. Although suture tape has been demonstrated to be an efficacious augment for tendonous repairs elsewhere in the body, it has not been investigated as a method for augmenting subscapularis peel repairs. PURPOSE: To determine the biomechanical efficacy of suture tape augmentation for the repair of a subscapularis peel. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric shoulders underwent a subscapularis peel. Specimens were randomly split into 2 groups: 6 specimens underwent repair using a transosseous bone tunnel technique with 3 high-strength sutures placed with a Mason-Allen configuration (control group), and 6 specimens underwent the control repair using augmentation with 2 suture tapes placed in an inverted mattress fashion and secured to the proximal humerus using a suture anchor (augmentation group). Shoulders underwent biomechanical testing to compare repair displacement with cyclic loading, load at ultimate failure, and construct stiffness. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in displacement after cyclic loading at the superior (P = .87), middle (P = .47), or inferior (P = .77) portions of the subscapularis tendon. Load to failure was significantly greater in the augmentation group (585.1 ± 97.4 N) than in the control group (358.5 ± 81.8 N) (P = .001). Stiffness was also greater in the augmentation group (71.8 ± 13.7 N/mm) when compared with the control group (48.7 ± 5.7 N/mm) (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Subscapularis peel repair with augmentation via 2 inverted mattress suture tapes secured with an anchor in the proximal humerus conferred significantly greater load at ultimate failure and construct stiffness when compared with a traditional repair using 3 Mason-Allen sutures. There was no difference in repair displacement with cyclic loading between the repair groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture tape augmentation of subscapularis peel repairs after shoulder arthroplasty provides an effective segment to the strength of the repair. SAGE Publications 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10087657/ /pubmed/37056453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231162361 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Wellington, Ian J.
Hewitt, Cory R.
Hawthorne, Benjamin C.
Mancini, Michael R.
Dorsey, Caitlin G.
Quintana, Julio O.
Talamo, Michael
Obopilwe, Elifho
Cote, Mark P.
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Sethi, Paul M.
Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title_full Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title_short Biomechanical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suture Tape Augmentation for Subscapularis Peel Repair
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of the efficacy of suture tape augmentation for subscapularis peel repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231162361
work_keys_str_mv AT wellingtonianj biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT hewittcoryr biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT hawthornebenjaminc biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT mancinimichaelr biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT dorseycaitling biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT quintanajulioo biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT talamomichael biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT obopilweelifho biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT cotemarkp biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT mazzoccaaugustusd biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair
AT sethipaulm biomechanicalevaluationoftheefficacyofsuturetapeaugmentationforsubscapularispeelrepair