Cargando…

ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation

Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously conside...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gragert, Loren, Kadatz, Matthew, Alcorn, James, Stewart, Darren, Chang, Doris, Gill, Jagbir, Liwski, Robert, Gebel, Howard M., Gill, John, Lan, James H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175
Descripción
Sumario:Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic‐weighted ABO‐adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA‐compatible donors that are ABO‐incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO‐adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO‐sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO‐adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO‐adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO‐adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune‐compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO‐compatible transplants without compromising equity.