Cargando…

ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation

Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously conside...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gragert, Loren, Kadatz, Matthew, Alcorn, James, Stewart, Darren, Chang, Doris, Gill, Jagbir, Liwski, Robert, Gebel, Howard M., Gill, John, Lan, James H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175
_version_ 1785022400483557376
author Gragert, Loren
Kadatz, Matthew
Alcorn, James
Stewart, Darren
Chang, Doris
Gill, Jagbir
Liwski, Robert
Gebel, Howard M.
Gill, John
Lan, James H.
author_facet Gragert, Loren
Kadatz, Matthew
Alcorn, James
Stewart, Darren
Chang, Doris
Gill, Jagbir
Liwski, Robert
Gebel, Howard M.
Gill, John
Lan, James H.
author_sort Gragert, Loren
collection PubMed
description Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic‐weighted ABO‐adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA‐compatible donors that are ABO‐incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO‐adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO‐sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO‐adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO‐adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO‐adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune‐compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO‐compatible transplants without compromising equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100876642023-04-12 ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation Gragert, Loren Kadatz, Matthew Alcorn, James Stewart, Darren Chang, Doris Gill, Jagbir Liwski, Robert Gebel, Howard M. Gill, John Lan, James H. Am J Transplant Brief Communications Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic‐weighted ABO‐adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA‐compatible donors that are ABO‐incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO‐adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO‐sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO‐adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO‐adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO‐adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune‐compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO‐compatible transplants without compromising equity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087664/ /pubmed/35975734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175 Text en © 2022 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Brief Communications
Gragert, Loren
Kadatz, Matthew
Alcorn, James
Stewart, Darren
Chang, Doris
Gill, Jagbir
Liwski, Robert
Gebel, Howard M.
Gill, John
Lan, James H.
ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title_full ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title_fullStr ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title_full_unstemmed ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title_short ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
title_sort abo‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cpra): a unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175
work_keys_str_mv AT gragertloren aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT kadatzmatthew aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT alcornjames aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT stewartdarren aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT changdoris aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT gilljagbir aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT liwskirobert aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT gebelhowardm aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT gilljohn aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation
AT lanjamesh aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation