Cargando…
ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation
Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously conside...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175 |
_version_ | 1785022400483557376 |
---|---|
author | Gragert, Loren Kadatz, Matthew Alcorn, James Stewart, Darren Chang, Doris Gill, Jagbir Liwski, Robert Gebel, Howard M. Gill, John Lan, James H. |
author_facet | Gragert, Loren Kadatz, Matthew Alcorn, James Stewart, Darren Chang, Doris Gill, Jagbir Liwski, Robert Gebel, Howard M. Gill, John Lan, James H. |
author_sort | Gragert, Loren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic‐weighted ABO‐adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA‐compatible donors that are ABO‐incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO‐adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO‐sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO‐adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO‐adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO‐adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune‐compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO‐compatible transplants without compromising equity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10087664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100876642023-04-12 ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation Gragert, Loren Kadatz, Matthew Alcorn, James Stewart, Darren Chang, Doris Gill, Jagbir Liwski, Robert Gebel, Howard M. Gill, John Lan, James H. Am J Transplant Brief Communications Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed “ABO‐adjusted cPRA,” which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic‐weighted ABO‐adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA‐compatible donors that are ABO‐incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO‐adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO‐sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO‐adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO‐adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO‐adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune‐compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO‐compatible transplants without compromising equity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10087664/ /pubmed/35975734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175 Text en © 2022 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communications Gragert, Loren Kadatz, Matthew Alcorn, James Stewart, Darren Chang, Doris Gill, Jagbir Liwski, Robert Gebel, Howard M. Gill, John Lan, James H. ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title | ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title_full | ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title_fullStr | ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title_short | ABO‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
title_sort | abo‐adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cpra): a unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation |
topic | Brief Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gragertloren aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT kadatzmatthew aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT alcornjames aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT stewartdarren aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT changdoris aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT gilljagbir aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT liwskirobert aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT gebelhowardm aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT gilljohn aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation AT lanjamesh aboadjustedcalculatedpanelreactiveantibodycpraaunifiedmetricforimmunologiccompatibilityinkidneytransplantation |