Cargando…

The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology

BACKGROUND: Commercial patch test substances do not cover all occupational contact allergens. Workplace materials and in‐house test substances are tested to complement the investigation of occupational skin disease (OSD). OBJECTIVES: To quantify the additional value of testing workplace materials an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina, Pesonen, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14191
_version_ 1785022410123116544
author Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina
Pesonen, Maria
author_facet Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina
Pesonen, Maria
author_sort Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Commercial patch test substances do not cover all occupational contact allergens. Workplace materials and in‐house test substances are tested to complement the investigation of occupational skin disease (OSD). OBJECTIVES: To quantify the additional value of testing workplace materials and non‐commercial in‐house test substances in the diagnosis of OSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients files of 544 patients patch tested at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in 2015–2019 were reviewed for occupation, diagnoses and patch test results. RESULTS: OSD was diagnosed in 353 (64.9%) of the patients. A total of 206 (37.9%) patients had occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD). In 19 (3.5%) patients, the only clues to the diagnoses of OACD were positive reactions to workplace materials, and in 20 (3.7%) patients, the diagnosis of OACD was based on commercially unavailable test substances. In 167 OACD cases diagnosed by commercial test substances, additional causes were found in 17 by testing patients' own and non‐commercial test substances. In 43 (7.9%) cases, positive reactions to workplace materials reinforced diagnoses based on commercial test substances. The overall additive value of testing own products was 16.7% (91 cases). CONCLUSION: We would have missed 39 (18.9%) of our 206 OACD cases if we had solely used commercial test substances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100877032023-04-12 The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina Pesonen, Maria Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Commercial patch test substances do not cover all occupational contact allergens. Workplace materials and in‐house test substances are tested to complement the investigation of occupational skin disease (OSD). OBJECTIVES: To quantify the additional value of testing workplace materials and non‐commercial in‐house test substances in the diagnosis of OSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients files of 544 patients patch tested at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in 2015–2019 were reviewed for occupation, diagnoses and patch test results. RESULTS: OSD was diagnosed in 353 (64.9%) of the patients. A total of 206 (37.9%) patients had occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD). In 19 (3.5%) patients, the only clues to the diagnoses of OACD were positive reactions to workplace materials, and in 20 (3.7%) patients, the diagnosis of OACD was based on commercially unavailable test substances. In 167 OACD cases diagnosed by commercial test substances, additional causes were found in 17 by testing patients' own and non‐commercial test substances. In 43 (7.9%) cases, positive reactions to workplace materials reinforced diagnoses based on commercial test substances. The overall additive value of testing own products was 16.7% (91 cases). CONCLUSION: We would have missed 39 (18.9%) of our 206 OACD cases if we had solely used commercial test substances. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-08-03 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10087703/ /pubmed/35864599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14191 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Aalto‐Korte, Kristiina
Pesonen, Maria
The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title_full The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title_fullStr The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title_full_unstemmed The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title_short The additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
title_sort additive value of patch testing non‐commercial test substances and patients' own products in a clinic of occupational dermatology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14191
work_keys_str_mv AT aaltokortekristiina theadditivevalueofpatchtestingnoncommercialtestsubstancesandpatientsownproductsinaclinicofoccupationaldermatology
AT pesonenmaria theadditivevalueofpatchtestingnoncommercialtestsubstancesandpatientsownproductsinaclinicofoccupationaldermatology
AT aaltokortekristiina additivevalueofpatchtestingnoncommercialtestsubstancesandpatientsownproductsinaclinicofoccupationaldermatology
AT pesonenmaria additivevalueofpatchtestingnoncommercialtestsubstancesandpatientsownproductsinaclinicofoccupationaldermatology