Cargando…
Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine intrasession repeatability of a worksheet style contrast sensitivity test (SpotChecks) in children and agreement with an established contrast sensitivity test (Pelli–Robson). METHODS: Forty‐three children aged 4 to 12 years participated in this sin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13054 |
_version_ | 1785022414476804096 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Heather A. Mathew, Anusha Rachel Cheng, Han |
author_facet | Anderson, Heather A. Mathew, Anusha Rachel Cheng, Han |
author_sort | Anderson, Heather A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine intrasession repeatability of a worksheet style contrast sensitivity test (SpotChecks) in children and agreement with an established contrast sensitivity test (Pelli–Robson). METHODS: Forty‐three children aged 4 to 12 years participated in this single visit study that included two administrations of the SpotChecks binocularly, a single administration of the Pelli–Robson test and other measures of visual performance such as high‐contrast visual acuity. Test order was randomised, and participants wore their habitual correction (39 unaided, 4 wearing glasses) for testing. Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the test–retest repeatability of SpotChecks and its agreement with the Pelli–Robson test. Multiple linear regressions were performed to evaluate whether contrast sensitivity was related to participant characteristics such as age, sex and near binocular visual acuity. RESULTS: The mean difference in log contrast sensitivity (logCS) between two administrations of the SpotChecks was 0.01, with a coefficient of repeatability (1.96*SD of differences) of 0.14 logCS. The mean difference between SpotChecks and Pelli–Robson was 0.00 logCS with 95% limits of agreement of −0.19 to +0.20. For both tests, a statistically significant increase in logCS was associated with age (slopes were 0.02 logCS/year, p < 0.001 and 0.01 logCS/year, p = 0.02 for the SpotChecks and Pelli–Robson tests, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The SpotChecks test shows good intrasession repeatability and excellent agreement with the Pelli–Robson test in children. Contrast sensitivity showed an increase in logCS with age in children for both tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10087722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100877222023-04-12 Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children Anderson, Heather A. Mathew, Anusha Rachel Cheng, Han Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Articles PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine intrasession repeatability of a worksheet style contrast sensitivity test (SpotChecks) in children and agreement with an established contrast sensitivity test (Pelli–Robson). METHODS: Forty‐three children aged 4 to 12 years participated in this single visit study that included two administrations of the SpotChecks binocularly, a single administration of the Pelli–Robson test and other measures of visual performance such as high‐contrast visual acuity. Test order was randomised, and participants wore their habitual correction (39 unaided, 4 wearing glasses) for testing. Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the test–retest repeatability of SpotChecks and its agreement with the Pelli–Robson test. Multiple linear regressions were performed to evaluate whether contrast sensitivity was related to participant characteristics such as age, sex and near binocular visual acuity. RESULTS: The mean difference in log contrast sensitivity (logCS) between two administrations of the SpotChecks was 0.01, with a coefficient of repeatability (1.96*SD of differences) of 0.14 logCS. The mean difference between SpotChecks and Pelli–Robson was 0.00 logCS with 95% limits of agreement of −0.19 to +0.20. For both tests, a statistically significant increase in logCS was associated with age (slopes were 0.02 logCS/year, p < 0.001 and 0.01 logCS/year, p = 0.02 for the SpotChecks and Pelli–Robson tests, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The SpotChecks test shows good intrasession repeatability and excellent agreement with the Pelli–Robson test in children. Contrast sensitivity showed an increase in logCS with age in children for both tests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-26 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10087722/ /pubmed/36164764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13054 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Anderson, Heather A. Mathew, Anusha Rachel Cheng, Han Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title | Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title_full | Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title_short | Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
title_sort | evaluation of the spotchecks contrast sensitivity test in children |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonheathera evaluationofthespotcheckscontrastsensitivitytestinchildren AT mathewanusharachel evaluationofthespotcheckscontrastsensitivitytestinchildren AT chenghan evaluationofthespotcheckscontrastsensitivitytestinchildren |