Cargando…
The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: Cytology performed directly on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples (reflex cytology) is feasible and for women with abnormal cytology, an additional cytology test at the general practitioner could be omitted. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of digital imaging (ThinPrep® Imaging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17272 |
_version_ | 1785022420150648832 |
---|---|
author | Wiersma, Danique Vinke, Anne Siebers, Albert G. Melchers, Willem J. G. Bekkers, Ruud L. M. Loopik, Diede L. |
author_facet | Wiersma, Danique Vinke, Anne Siebers, Albert G. Melchers, Willem J. G. Bekkers, Ruud L. M. Loopik, Diede L. |
author_sort | Wiersma, Danique |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cytology performed directly on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples (reflex cytology) is feasible and for women with abnormal cytology, an additional cytology test at the general practitioner could be omitted. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of digital imaging (ThinPrep® Imaging System) on the clinical utility of reflex cytology by reducing screening error. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: One of five Dutch screening laboratories. POPULATION: Women tested hrHPV‐positive on self‐samples between December 2018 and August 2019. METHODS: Self‐samples were used for reflex cytology with and without digital imaging. The follow‐up data (cytological and histological results within 1 year of follow‐up) were obtained through the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test performance of the reflex cytology was determined by comparing it with physician‐collected follow‐up results. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detecting abnormal cells by reflex cytology on self‐samples increased significantly from 26.3% (42/160; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.6–33.8) without digital imaging to 35.4% (56/158; 95% CI 28–43.4) with digital imaging (P < 0.05) without compromising specificity. Importantly, 41.7% of women with ≥CIN2 (35/84) and 45.6% with ≥CIN3 (26/57) were detected by reflex cytology with digital imaging on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples. CONCLUSION: Digital imaging is of added value to reflex cytology on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples with a 9% increase in sensitivity. If reflex cytology on self‐samples analysed with digital imaging had been implemented in the screening programme, 35.4% of the hrHPV‐positive women with abnormal cytology on additional physician‐collected samples could have been referred directly for colposcopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10087746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100877462023-04-12 The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study Wiersma, Danique Vinke, Anne Siebers, Albert G. Melchers, Willem J. G. Bekkers, Ruud L. M. Loopik, Diede L. BJOG RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: Cytology performed directly on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples (reflex cytology) is feasible and for women with abnormal cytology, an additional cytology test at the general practitioner could be omitted. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of digital imaging (ThinPrep® Imaging System) on the clinical utility of reflex cytology by reducing screening error. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: One of five Dutch screening laboratories. POPULATION: Women tested hrHPV‐positive on self‐samples between December 2018 and August 2019. METHODS: Self‐samples were used for reflex cytology with and without digital imaging. The follow‐up data (cytological and histological results within 1 year of follow‐up) were obtained through the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test performance of the reflex cytology was determined by comparing it with physician‐collected follow‐up results. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detecting abnormal cells by reflex cytology on self‐samples increased significantly from 26.3% (42/160; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.6–33.8) without digital imaging to 35.4% (56/158; 95% CI 28–43.4) with digital imaging (P < 0.05) without compromising specificity. Importantly, 41.7% of women with ≥CIN2 (35/84) and 45.6% with ≥CIN3 (26/57) were detected by reflex cytology with digital imaging on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples. CONCLUSION: Digital imaging is of added value to reflex cytology on hrHPV‐positive self‐samples with a 9% increase in sensitivity. If reflex cytology on self‐samples analysed with digital imaging had been implemented in the screening programme, 35.4% of the hrHPV‐positive women with abnormal cytology on additional physician‐collected samples could have been referred directly for colposcopy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-22 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10087746/ /pubmed/35993438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17272 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Wiersma, Danique Vinke, Anne Siebers, Albert G. Melchers, Willem J. G. Bekkers, Ruud L. M. Loopik, Diede L. The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title | The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title_full | The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title_short | The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study |
title_sort | added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high‐risk human papillomavirus positive self‐sampled material in cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiersmadanique theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT vinkeanne theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT siebersalbertg theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT melcherswillemjg theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT bekkersruudlm theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT loopikdiedel theaddedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT wiersmadanique addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT vinkeanne addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT siebersalbertg addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT melcherswillemjg addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT bekkersruudlm addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT loopikdiedel addedvalueofdigitalimagingtoreflexcytologyfortriageofhighriskhumanpapillomaviruspositiveselfsampledmaterialincervicalcancerscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy |