Cargando…

Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to regulate emotions effectively has been associated with resilience to psychopathology. Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been shown to have higher levels of negative emotionality, with some evidence suggesting impairment in emotion regulation com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stellern, Jordan, Xiao, Ke Bin, Grennell, Erin, Sanches, Marcos, Gowin, Joshua L., Sloan, Matthew E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16001
_version_ 1785022436078518272
author Stellern, Jordan
Xiao, Ke Bin
Grennell, Erin
Sanches, Marcos
Gowin, Joshua L.
Sloan, Matthew E.
author_facet Stellern, Jordan
Xiao, Ke Bin
Grennell, Erin
Sanches, Marcos
Gowin, Joshua L.
Sloan, Matthew E.
author_sort Stellern, Jordan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to regulate emotions effectively has been associated with resilience to psychopathology. Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been shown to have higher levels of negative emotionality, with some evidence suggesting impairment in emotion regulation compared with individuals without SUDs. However, no previous attempt has been made to systematically review the literature to assess the magnitude of this difference. We aimed to assess the association between SUD diagnosis and emotion regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) through a systematic review and meta‐analysis of existing findings. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase. We examined cross‐sectional studies that compared a SUD group with a control group and measured emotion regulation using the DERS or the ERQ. The primary analysis focused on papers using the DERS, as this was the predominant instrument in the literature. RESULTS: Twenty‐two studies met our primary analysis criteria, representing 1936 individuals with a SUD and 1567 controls. Individuals with SUDs relative to controls had significantly greater DERS scores, with a mean difference of 21.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 16.49–26.40, P < 0.001] and Hedges’ g = 1.05 (95% CI = 0.86–1.24, P < 0.001). The difference was robust, remaining significant after removing outliers and studies with high risk of bias. Individuals with SUDs demonstrated poorer emotion regulation on each subscale of the DERS, with the largest deficits in the Strategies and Impulse subscales. The ERQ analysis revealed greater use of expressive suppression in those with SUDs relative to controls (Hedges’ g = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.25–1.28, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: People with substance use disorders appear to have greater difficulties in emotion regulation than people without substance use disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100878162023-04-12 Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Stellern, Jordan Xiao, Ke Bin Grennell, Erin Sanches, Marcos Gowin, Joshua L. Sloan, Matthew E. Addiction Reviews BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to regulate emotions effectively has been associated with resilience to psychopathology. Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been shown to have higher levels of negative emotionality, with some evidence suggesting impairment in emotion regulation compared with individuals without SUDs. However, no previous attempt has been made to systematically review the literature to assess the magnitude of this difference. We aimed to assess the association between SUD diagnosis and emotion regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) through a systematic review and meta‐analysis of existing findings. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase. We examined cross‐sectional studies that compared a SUD group with a control group and measured emotion regulation using the DERS or the ERQ. The primary analysis focused on papers using the DERS, as this was the predominant instrument in the literature. RESULTS: Twenty‐two studies met our primary analysis criteria, representing 1936 individuals with a SUD and 1567 controls. Individuals with SUDs relative to controls had significantly greater DERS scores, with a mean difference of 21.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 16.49–26.40, P < 0.001] and Hedges’ g = 1.05 (95% CI = 0.86–1.24, P < 0.001). The difference was robust, remaining significant after removing outliers and studies with high risk of bias. Individuals with SUDs demonstrated poorer emotion regulation on each subscale of the DERS, with the largest deficits in the Strategies and Impulse subscales. The ERQ analysis revealed greater use of expressive suppression in those with SUDs relative to controls (Hedges’ g = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.25–1.28, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: People with substance use disorders appear to have greater difficulties in emotion regulation than people without substance use disorders. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-11 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10087816/ /pubmed/35851975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16001 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Stellern, Jordan
Xiao, Ke Bin
Grennell, Erin
Sanches, Marcos
Gowin, Joshua L.
Sloan, Matthew E.
Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16001
work_keys_str_mv AT stellernjordan emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaokebin emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grennellerin emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sanchesmarcos emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gowinjoshual emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sloanmatthewe emotionregulationinsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis