Cargando…

Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's preference for modified Manchester (MM) or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SH) as surgery for uterine prolapse. DESIGN: Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). SETTING: Eight Dutch hospitals. POPULATION: Women with uterine prolapse, eligible for primary surgery an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Schulten, Sascha F. M., Essers, Brigitte, Notten, Kim J. B., Enklaar, Rosa A., van Leijsen, Sanne A. L., van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F., Kluivers, Kirsten B., Weemhoff, Mirjam
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:	Research Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17280

Ejemplares similares

Gynecologists’ perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester
por: Enklaar, Rosa A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study)
por: Schulten, Sascha F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial
por: Schulten, Sascha F M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome
por: Enklaar, Rosa A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus
por: Dietz, Viviane, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
por: Detollenaere, Renée J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse
por: Wang, Kaiyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)
por: van IJsselmuiden, Mèlanie N, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse
por: Jirschele, K., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes
por: van Oudheusden, Anique M.J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study
por: Dietz, Viviane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion
por: Achermann, Arnold P. P., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Recurrence risk is associated with preoperatively advanced prolapse stage: Is there a difference between women with stage 2 and those with stage 3 or 4 cystocele?
por: Vergeldt, Tineke F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Prolapse Hysterectomy with Apical Fixation: A Retrospective Comparison over an 18 Year Period
por: Carlin, Greta Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study
por: Naumann, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Gynecologists’ perspectives on surgical treatment for apical prolapse: a qualitative study
por: van Oudheusden, Anique M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Choice of mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy after OASI: a survey among Dutch gynecologists
por: Donners, Judith J. A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment
por: Schellings, Ron, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A discrete choice experiment to identify the most efficient quality indicators for the supervision of psychiatric hospitals
por: van Dijk, Pieter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A fetal scalp electrode as a simple aid in the search for a lost needle fragment during sacrospinous ligament fixation
por: Schoonenberg, Marieke P. G., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review
por: Vergeldt, Tineke F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
por: Rademaker, Maaike M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laparoscopic Hysteropexy in a Patient with Spina Bifida and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
por: Ghomi, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy—a case series
por: Jefferis, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Location and motion of vaginal pessaries in situ in women with successful and unsuccessful pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse
por: Boogaard, Lars L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

De-implementation of urodynamics in The Netherlands after the VALUE/VUSIS-2 results: a nationwide survey
por: Mengerink, Bianca B., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The value of preoperative urodynamics according to gynecologists and urologists with special interest in stress urinary incontinence
por: van Leijsen, Sanne A. L., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Serious complication 1 year after sacrospinous ligament fixation
por: Faber, Violet J., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse
por: Kachroo, Naveen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment preferences for medication or surgery in patients with deep endometriosis and bowel involvement – a discrete choice experiment
por: Metzemaekers, Jeroen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol
por: Coolen, Anne-Lotte W. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Patient Preference for Optical Coherence Tomography versus Punch Biopsy as Diagnostic Strategy for Diagnosis of Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Labelled Discrete Choice Experiment
por: ADAN, Fieke, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments influence in pelvis kinematics
por: Henyš, Petr, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial)
por: Detollenaere, Renée J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Outcomes of laparoscopic hysteropexy and supracervical hysterectomy plus cervicopexy: A retrospective study
por: Li, Pei-Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison
por: Gopinath, Deepa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sacrospinous ligament suspension with transobturator mesh versus sacral colpopexy for genital prolapse
por: Juliato, Cássia R.T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Surgical management of pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation
por: Vodegel, Eva V., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Avulsion of puborectalis muscle and other risk factors for cystocele recurrence: a 2-year follow-up study
por: Weemhoff, Mirjam, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A Posterior Approach to Laparoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
por: Kong, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_dr38h6bdk0j8muv6a4t6tp5uf8