Cargando…

Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type

BACKGROUND: Disability status is associated with correlates of suicide risk (perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, negative future disposition, felt stigma, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts). AIMS: This study aimed to examine whether suicide‐related correlates differ significantly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khazem, Lauren R., Pearlstien, Jennifer G., Anestis, Michael D., Gratz, Kim L., Tull, Matthew T., Bryan, Craig J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23419
_version_ 1785022458801160192
author Khazem, Lauren R.
Pearlstien, Jennifer G.
Anestis, Michael D.
Gratz, Kim L.
Tull, Matthew T.
Bryan, Craig J.
author_facet Khazem, Lauren R.
Pearlstien, Jennifer G.
Anestis, Michael D.
Gratz, Kim L.
Tull, Matthew T.
Bryan, Craig J.
author_sort Khazem, Lauren R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disability status is associated with correlates of suicide risk (perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, negative future disposition, felt stigma, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts). AIMS: This study aimed to examine whether suicide‐related correlates differ significantly as a function of disability type. METHODS: Individuals with mobility and vision disabilities (N = 102) completed semistructured interviews and online‐based questionnaires. Analysis of variance/analysis of covaiance and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to examine whether mean levels of suicide‐related correlates differed significantly between individuals with blindness/low vision (n = 63) versus mobility‐related (n = 39) disabilities. RESULTS: No significant between‐group differences were observed for most outcomes; however, individuals with vision disabilities reported higher mean levels of felt stigma and positive future disposition than those with mobility‐related disabilities. LIMITATIONS: The limited representation of disabilities among participants precludes generalization to individuals with other forms of disability and the cross‐sectional design prevents inference about causality. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting cognitive processes that underlie suicide risk may be applicable to people with mobility and vision disabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10087921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100879212023-04-12 Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type Khazem, Lauren R. Pearlstien, Jennifer G. Anestis, Michael D. Gratz, Kim L. Tull, Matthew T. Bryan, Craig J. J Clin Psychol Regular Articles BACKGROUND: Disability status is associated with correlates of suicide risk (perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, negative future disposition, felt stigma, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts). AIMS: This study aimed to examine whether suicide‐related correlates differ significantly as a function of disability type. METHODS: Individuals with mobility and vision disabilities (N = 102) completed semistructured interviews and online‐based questionnaires. Analysis of variance/analysis of covaiance and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to examine whether mean levels of suicide‐related correlates differed significantly between individuals with blindness/low vision (n = 63) versus mobility‐related (n = 39) disabilities. RESULTS: No significant between‐group differences were observed for most outcomes; however, individuals with vision disabilities reported higher mean levels of felt stigma and positive future disposition than those with mobility‐related disabilities. LIMITATIONS: The limited representation of disabilities among participants precludes generalization to individuals with other forms of disability and the cross‐sectional design prevents inference about causality. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting cognitive processes that underlie suicide risk may be applicable to people with mobility and vision disabilities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-31 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10087921/ /pubmed/35909343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23419 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Khazem, Lauren R.
Pearlstien, Jennifer G.
Anestis, Michael D.
Gratz, Kim L.
Tull, Matthew T.
Bryan, Craig J.
Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title_full Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title_fullStr Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title_full_unstemmed Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title_short Differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
title_sort differences in suicide risk correlates and history of suicide ideation and attempts as a function of disability type
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10087921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23419
work_keys_str_mv AT khazemlaurenr differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype
AT pearlstienjenniferg differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype
AT anestismichaeld differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype
AT gratzkiml differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype
AT tullmatthewt differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype
AT bryancraigj differencesinsuicideriskcorrelatesandhistoryofsuicideideationandattemptsasafunctionofdisabilitytype