Cargando…
Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM
BACKGROUND: Wheat is a major cereal that can narrow the gap between the increasing human population and food production. In this connection, assessing genetic diversity and conserving wheat genetic resources for future exploitation is very important for breeding new cultivars that may withstand the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04196-w |
_version_ | 1785022531163389952 |
---|---|
author | Abouseada, Heba H. Mohamed, Al-Safa H. Teleb, Samir S. Badr, Abdelfattah Tantawy, Mohamed E. Ibrahim, Shafik D. Ellmouni, Faten Y. Ibrahim, Mohamed |
author_facet | Abouseada, Heba H. Mohamed, Al-Safa H. Teleb, Samir S. Badr, Abdelfattah Tantawy, Mohamed E. Ibrahim, Shafik D. Ellmouni, Faten Y. Ibrahim, Mohamed |
author_sort | Abouseada, Heba H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wheat is a major cereal that can narrow the gap between the increasing human population and food production. In this connection, assessing genetic diversity and conserving wheat genetic resources for future exploitation is very important for breeding new cultivars that may withstand the expected climate change. The current study evaluates the genetic diversity in selected wheat cultivars using ISSR and SCoT markers, the rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding, and grain surface sculpture characteristics. We anticipate that these objectives may prioritize using the selected cultivars to improve wheat production. The selected collection of cultivars may lead to the identification of cultivars adapted to a broad spectrum of climatic environments. RESULTS: Multivariate clustering analyses of the ISSR and SCoT DNA fingerprinting polymorphism grouped three Egyptian cultivars with cultivar El-Nielain from Sudan, cultivar Aguilal from Morocco, and cultivar Attila from Mexico. In the other group, cultivar Cook from Australia and cultivar Chinese-166 were differentiated from four other cultivars: cultivar Cham-10 from Syria, cultivar Seri-82 from Mexico, cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, and cultivar Sonalika from India. In the PCA analysis, the Egyptian cultivars were distinct from the other studied cultivars. The rbcL and matK sequence variation analysis indicated similarities between Egyptian cultivars and cultivar Cham-10 from Syria and cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, whereas cultivar Attila from Mexico was distinguished from all other cultivars. Combining the data of ISSR and SCoT with the rbcL and matK results retained the close resemblance among the two Egyptian cultivars EGY1: Gemmeiza-9 and EGY3: Sakha-93, and the Moroccan cultivar Aguilal, and the Sudanese cultivar El-Nielain and between Seri-82, Inqalab-91, and Sonalika cultivars. The analysis of all data distinguished cultivar Cham-10 from Syria from all other cultivars, and the analysis of grain traits indicated a close resemblance between cv. Cham-10 from and the two Egyptian cultivars Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding agrees with the ISSR and the SCoT markers in supporting the close resemblance between the Egyptian cultivars, particularly Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93. The ISSR and SCoT data analyses significantly expressed high differentiation levels among the examined cultivars. Cultivars with closer resemblance may be recommended for breeding new wheat cultivars adapted to various climatic environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-023-04196-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10088244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100882442023-04-12 Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM Abouseada, Heba H. Mohamed, Al-Safa H. Teleb, Samir S. Badr, Abdelfattah Tantawy, Mohamed E. Ibrahim, Shafik D. Ellmouni, Faten Y. Ibrahim, Mohamed BMC Plant Biol Research BACKGROUND: Wheat is a major cereal that can narrow the gap between the increasing human population and food production. In this connection, assessing genetic diversity and conserving wheat genetic resources for future exploitation is very important for breeding new cultivars that may withstand the expected climate change. The current study evaluates the genetic diversity in selected wheat cultivars using ISSR and SCoT markers, the rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding, and grain surface sculpture characteristics. We anticipate that these objectives may prioritize using the selected cultivars to improve wheat production. The selected collection of cultivars may lead to the identification of cultivars adapted to a broad spectrum of climatic environments. RESULTS: Multivariate clustering analyses of the ISSR and SCoT DNA fingerprinting polymorphism grouped three Egyptian cultivars with cultivar El-Nielain from Sudan, cultivar Aguilal from Morocco, and cultivar Attila from Mexico. In the other group, cultivar Cook from Australia and cultivar Chinese-166 were differentiated from four other cultivars: cultivar Cham-10 from Syria, cultivar Seri-82 from Mexico, cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, and cultivar Sonalika from India. In the PCA analysis, the Egyptian cultivars were distinct from the other studied cultivars. The rbcL and matK sequence variation analysis indicated similarities between Egyptian cultivars and cultivar Cham-10 from Syria and cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, whereas cultivar Attila from Mexico was distinguished from all other cultivars. Combining the data of ISSR and SCoT with the rbcL and matK results retained the close resemblance among the two Egyptian cultivars EGY1: Gemmeiza-9 and EGY3: Sakha-93, and the Moroccan cultivar Aguilal, and the Sudanese cultivar El-Nielain and between Seri-82, Inqalab-91, and Sonalika cultivars. The analysis of all data distinguished cultivar Cham-10 from Syria from all other cultivars, and the analysis of grain traits indicated a close resemblance between cv. Cham-10 from and the two Egyptian cultivars Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding agrees with the ISSR and the SCoT markers in supporting the close resemblance between the Egyptian cultivars, particularly Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93. The ISSR and SCoT data analyses significantly expressed high differentiation levels among the examined cultivars. Cultivars with closer resemblance may be recommended for breeding new wheat cultivars adapted to various climatic environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-023-04196-w. BioMed Central 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10088244/ /pubmed/37041463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04196-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Abouseada, Heba H. Mohamed, Al-Safa H. Teleb, Samir S. Badr, Abdelfattah Tantawy, Mohamed E. Ibrahim, Shafik D. Ellmouni, Faten Y. Ibrahim, Mohamed Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title | Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title_full | Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title_fullStr | Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title_short | Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM |
title_sort | genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using scot and issr markers, chloroplast dna barcoding and grain sem |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04196-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abouseadahebah geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT mohamedalsafah geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT telebsamirs geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT badrabdelfattah geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT tantawymohamede geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT ibrahimshafikd geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT ellmounifateny geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem AT ibrahimmohamed geneticdiversityanalysisinwheatcultivarsusingscotandissrmarkerschloroplastdnabarcodingandgrainsem |