Cargando…

Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany

BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthes, Anni, Wolf, Florian, Schmiemann, Guido, Gágyor, Ildikó, Bleidorn, Jutta, Markwart, Robby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37038122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0
_version_ 1785022534752665600
author Matthes, Anni
Wolf, Florian
Schmiemann, Guido
Gágyor, Ildikó
Bleidorn, Jutta
Markwart, Robby
author_facet Matthes, Anni
Wolf, Florian
Schmiemann, Guido
Gágyor, Ildikó
Bleidorn, Jutta
Markwart, Robby
author_sort Matthes, Anni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requirements. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among GPs in Germany (federal states of Thuringia, Bremen and Bavaria (Lower Franconia), study period: 04/22–06/2022). RESULTS: From 2,014 GPs reached, 292 participated in our study (response rate: 14.5%). The median number of POCTs used per GP was 7.0 (IQR: 5.0–8.0). Six POCTs are used by the majority of surveyed GPs (> 50%): urine dipstick tests (99%), glucose (urine [91%] and plasma [69%]), SARS-CoV-2 (80%), urine microalbumin (77%), troponin I/T (74%) and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio (65%). The number of utilized POCTs did not differ between GP practice type (p = 0.307) and population size of GP practice location (p = 0.099). The great majority of participating German GPs (93%) rated POCTs as useful diagnostic tools in the GP practice. GPs ranked immediate decisions on patient management and the increase in diagnostic certainty as the most important reasons for performing POCTs. The most frequently reported limitations of POCT use in the GP practice were economic aspects (high costs and inadequate reimbursement), concerns regarding diagnostic accuracy, and difficulties to integrate POCT-testing into practice routines (e.g. time and personnel expenses). CONCLUSION: Although participating German GPs generally perceive POCTs as useful diagnostic tools and numerous POCTs are available, several test-related and contextual factors contribute to the relatively low utilization of POCTs in primary care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10088261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100882612023-04-12 Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany Matthes, Anni Wolf, Florian Schmiemann, Guido Gágyor, Ildikó Bleidorn, Jutta Markwart, Robby BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requirements. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among GPs in Germany (federal states of Thuringia, Bremen and Bavaria (Lower Franconia), study period: 04/22–06/2022). RESULTS: From 2,014 GPs reached, 292 participated in our study (response rate: 14.5%). The median number of POCTs used per GP was 7.0 (IQR: 5.0–8.0). Six POCTs are used by the majority of surveyed GPs (> 50%): urine dipstick tests (99%), glucose (urine [91%] and plasma [69%]), SARS-CoV-2 (80%), urine microalbumin (77%), troponin I/T (74%) and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio (65%). The number of utilized POCTs did not differ between GP practice type (p = 0.307) and population size of GP practice location (p = 0.099). The great majority of participating German GPs (93%) rated POCTs as useful diagnostic tools in the GP practice. GPs ranked immediate decisions on patient management and the increase in diagnostic certainty as the most important reasons for performing POCTs. The most frequently reported limitations of POCT use in the GP practice were economic aspects (high costs and inadequate reimbursement), concerns regarding diagnostic accuracy, and difficulties to integrate POCT-testing into practice routines (e.g. time and personnel expenses). CONCLUSION: Although participating German GPs generally perceive POCTs as useful diagnostic tools and numerous POCTs are available, several test-related and contextual factors contribute to the relatively low utilization of POCTs in primary care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0. BioMed Central 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10088261/ /pubmed/37038122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Matthes, Anni
Wolf, Florian
Schmiemann, Guido
Gágyor, Ildikó
Bleidorn, Jutta
Markwart, Robby
Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title_full Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title_fullStr Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title_short Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
title_sort point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37038122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0
work_keys_str_mv AT matthesanni pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT wolfflorian pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT schmiemannguido pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT gagyorildiko pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT bleidornjutta pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT markwartrobby pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany