Cargando…
Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany
BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37038122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0 |
_version_ | 1785022534752665600 |
---|---|
author | Matthes, Anni Wolf, Florian Schmiemann, Guido Gágyor, Ildikó Bleidorn, Jutta Markwart, Robby |
author_facet | Matthes, Anni Wolf, Florian Schmiemann, Guido Gágyor, Ildikó Bleidorn, Jutta Markwart, Robby |
author_sort | Matthes, Anni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requirements. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among GPs in Germany (federal states of Thuringia, Bremen and Bavaria (Lower Franconia), study period: 04/22–06/2022). RESULTS: From 2,014 GPs reached, 292 participated in our study (response rate: 14.5%). The median number of POCTs used per GP was 7.0 (IQR: 5.0–8.0). Six POCTs are used by the majority of surveyed GPs (> 50%): urine dipstick tests (99%), glucose (urine [91%] and plasma [69%]), SARS-CoV-2 (80%), urine microalbumin (77%), troponin I/T (74%) and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio (65%). The number of utilized POCTs did not differ between GP practice type (p = 0.307) and population size of GP practice location (p = 0.099). The great majority of participating German GPs (93%) rated POCTs as useful diagnostic tools in the GP practice. GPs ranked immediate decisions on patient management and the increase in diagnostic certainty as the most important reasons for performing POCTs. The most frequently reported limitations of POCT use in the GP practice were economic aspects (high costs and inadequate reimbursement), concerns regarding diagnostic accuracy, and difficulties to integrate POCT-testing into practice routines (e.g. time and personnel expenses). CONCLUSION: Although participating German GPs generally perceive POCTs as useful diagnostic tools and numerous POCTs are available, several test-related and contextual factors contribute to the relatively low utilization of POCTs in primary care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10088261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100882612023-04-12 Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany Matthes, Anni Wolf, Florian Schmiemann, Guido Gágyor, Ildikó Bleidorn, Jutta Markwart, Robby BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Due to their fast turnaround time and user-friendliness, point-of-care tests (POCTs) possess a great potential in primary care. The purpose of the study was to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on POCT use in German primary care, including utilization, limitations and requirements. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among GPs in Germany (federal states of Thuringia, Bremen and Bavaria (Lower Franconia), study period: 04/22–06/2022). RESULTS: From 2,014 GPs reached, 292 participated in our study (response rate: 14.5%). The median number of POCTs used per GP was 7.0 (IQR: 5.0–8.0). Six POCTs are used by the majority of surveyed GPs (> 50%): urine dipstick tests (99%), glucose (urine [91%] and plasma [69%]), SARS-CoV-2 (80%), urine microalbumin (77%), troponin I/T (74%) and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio (65%). The number of utilized POCTs did not differ between GP practice type (p = 0.307) and population size of GP practice location (p = 0.099). The great majority of participating German GPs (93%) rated POCTs as useful diagnostic tools in the GP practice. GPs ranked immediate decisions on patient management and the increase in diagnostic certainty as the most important reasons for performing POCTs. The most frequently reported limitations of POCT use in the GP practice were economic aspects (high costs and inadequate reimbursement), concerns regarding diagnostic accuracy, and difficulties to integrate POCT-testing into practice routines (e.g. time and personnel expenses). CONCLUSION: Although participating German GPs generally perceive POCTs as useful diagnostic tools and numerous POCTs are available, several test-related and contextual factors contribute to the relatively low utilization of POCTs in primary care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0. BioMed Central 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10088261/ /pubmed/37038122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Matthes, Anni Wolf, Florian Schmiemann, Guido Gágyor, Ildikó Bleidorn, Jutta Markwart, Robby Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title | Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title_full | Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title_fullStr | Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title_short | Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany |
title_sort | point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in germany |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37038122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02054-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthesanni pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT wolfflorian pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT schmiemannguido pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT gagyorildiko pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT bleidornjutta pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT markwartrobby pointofcarelaboratorytestinginprimarycareutilizationlimitationsandperspectivesofgeneralpractitionersingermany |