Cargando…

A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph, Jeremiah, Faless, Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence, Ng’ambi, Wingston, Nkungula, Nthanda, Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel, Juma, Mercy, Chawani, Marlen, Chinkhumba, Jobiba, Twea, Pakwanja, Chirwa, Emily, Langwe, Kate, Manthalu, Gerald, Ngwira, Lucky Gift, Nkhoma, Dominic, Colbourn, Tim, Revill, Paul, Sculpher, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z
_version_ 1785022612705902592
author Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
Jeremiah, Faless
Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence
Ng’ambi, Wingston
Nkungula, Nthanda
Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel
Juma, Mercy
Chawani, Marlen
Chinkhumba, Jobiba
Twea, Pakwanja
Chirwa, Emily
Langwe, Kate
Manthalu, Gerald
Ngwira, Lucky Gift
Nkhoma, Dominic
Colbourn, Tim
Revill, Paul
Sculpher, Mark
author_facet Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
Jeremiah, Faless
Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence
Ng’ambi, Wingston
Nkungula, Nthanda
Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel
Juma, Mercy
Chawani, Marlen
Chinkhumba, Jobiba
Twea, Pakwanja
Chirwa, Emily
Langwe, Kate
Manthalu, Gerald
Ngwira, Lucky Gift
Nkhoma, Dominic
Colbourn, Tim
Revill, Paul
Sculpher, Mark
author_sort Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10088659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100886592023-04-12 A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Jeremiah, Faless Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence Ng’ambi, Wingston Nkungula, Nthanda Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel Juma, Mercy Chawani, Marlen Chinkhumba, Jobiba Twea, Pakwanja Chirwa, Emily Langwe, Kate Manthalu, Gerald Ngwira, Lucky Gift Nkhoma, Dominic Colbourn, Tim Revill, Paul Sculpher, Mark BMC Health Serv Res Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z. BioMed Central 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10088659/ /pubmed/37041590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
Jeremiah, Faless
Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence
Ng’ambi, Wingston
Nkungula, Nthanda
Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel
Juma, Mercy
Chawani, Marlen
Chinkhumba, Jobiba
Twea, Pakwanja
Chirwa, Emily
Langwe, Kate
Manthalu, Gerald
Ngwira, Lucky Gift
Nkhoma, Dominic
Colbourn, Tim
Revill, Paul
Sculpher, Mark
A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title_full A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title_fullStr A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title_short A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
title_sort qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in malawi
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mfutsobengojoseph aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT jeremiahfaless aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT kasendechinguwoflorence aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT ngambiwingston aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT nkungulanthanda aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT kazangachiumiaisabel aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT jumamercy aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chawanimarlen aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chinkhumbajobiba aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT tweapakwanja aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chirwaemily aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT langwekate aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT manthalugerald aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT ngwiraluckygift aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT nkhomadominic aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT colbourntim aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT revillpaul aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT sculphermark aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT mfutsobengojoseph qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT jeremiahfaless qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT kasendechinguwoflorence qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT ngambiwingston qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT nkungulanthanda qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT kazangachiumiaisabel qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT jumamercy qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chawanimarlen qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chinkhumbajobiba qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT tweapakwanja qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT chirwaemily qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT langwekate qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT manthalugerald qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT ngwiraluckygift qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT nkhomadominic qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT colbourntim qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT revillpaul qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi
AT sculphermark qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi