Cargando…
A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z |
_version_ | 1785022612705902592 |
---|---|
author | Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Jeremiah, Faless Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence Ng’ambi, Wingston Nkungula, Nthanda Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel Juma, Mercy Chawani, Marlen Chinkhumba, Jobiba Twea, Pakwanja Chirwa, Emily Langwe, Kate Manthalu, Gerald Ngwira, Lucky Gift Nkhoma, Dominic Colbourn, Tim Revill, Paul Sculpher, Mark |
author_facet | Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Jeremiah, Faless Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence Ng’ambi, Wingston Nkungula, Nthanda Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel Juma, Mercy Chawani, Marlen Chinkhumba, Jobiba Twea, Pakwanja Chirwa, Emily Langwe, Kate Manthalu, Gerald Ngwira, Lucky Gift Nkhoma, Dominic Colbourn, Tim Revill, Paul Sculpher, Mark |
author_sort | Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10088659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100886592023-04-12 A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Jeremiah, Faless Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence Ng’ambi, Wingston Nkungula, Nthanda Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel Juma, Mercy Chawani, Marlen Chinkhumba, Jobiba Twea, Pakwanja Chirwa, Emily Langwe, Kate Manthalu, Gerald Ngwira, Lucky Gift Nkhoma, Dominic Colbourn, Tim Revill, Paul Sculpher, Mark BMC Health Serv Res Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS: This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z. BioMed Central 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10088659/ /pubmed/37041590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Jeremiah, Faless Kasende-Chinguwo, Florence Ng’ambi, Wingston Nkungula, Nthanda Kazanga-Chiumia, Isabel Juma, Mercy Chawani, Marlen Chinkhumba, Jobiba Twea, Pakwanja Chirwa, Emily Langwe, Kate Manthalu, Gerald Ngwira, Lucky Gift Nkhoma, Dominic Colbourn, Tim Revill, Paul Sculpher, Mark A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title | A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title_full | A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title_fullStr | A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title_short | A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi |
title_sort | qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in malawi |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mfutsobengojoseph aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT jeremiahfaless aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT kasendechinguwoflorence aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT ngambiwingston aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT nkungulanthanda aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT kazangachiumiaisabel aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT jumamercy aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chawanimarlen aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chinkhumbajobiba aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT tweapakwanja aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chirwaemily aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT langwekate aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT manthalugerald aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT ngwiraluckygift aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT nkhomadominic aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT colbourntim aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT revillpaul aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT sculphermark aqualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT mfutsobengojoseph qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT jeremiahfaless qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT kasendechinguwoflorence qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT ngambiwingston qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT nkungulanthanda qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT kazangachiumiaisabel qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT jumamercy qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chawanimarlen qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chinkhumbajobiba qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT tweapakwanja qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT chirwaemily qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT langwekate qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT manthalugerald qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT ngwiraluckygift qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT nkhomadominic qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT colbourntim qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT revillpaul qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi AT sculphermark qualitativestudyonthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinstitutionalizinghealthtechnologyassessmentinmalawi |