Cargando…

Effect of cefuroxime intracameral injection antibiotic prophylactic on postoperative endophthalmitis wound post‐cataract: A meta‐analysis

To assess the impact of cefuroxime injection of intracameral prophylaxis antibiotic on after endophthalmitis operative wound following surgery of cataract, we conducted a meta‐analysis. A thorough review of the literature up to July 2022 revealed that there were 1 167 197 participants with surgery o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Min, Liu, Yun, Dong, Hongming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36346142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13984
Descripción
Sumario:To assess the impact of cefuroxime injection of intracameral prophylaxis antibiotic on after endophthalmitis operative wound following surgery of cataract, we conducted a meta‐analysis. A thorough review of the literature up to July 2022 revealed that there were 1 167 197 participants with surgery of cataract at the start of the research; 1 004 425 of these subjects received an injection of intracameral of cefuroxime, while 162 772 did not get an antibiotic as a control. Using dichotomous approaches and a random or fixed‐effect model, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate the impact of cefuroxime injection of intracameral prophylaxis antibiotic on after endophthalmitis operative wound following surgery of cataract. When comparing no antibiotic in participants who had surgery of cataract, the cefuroxime injection of intracameral significantly reduced the after endophthalmitis operative wound (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07–0.29, P = 0.001) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 95%). When comparing participants who received no antibiotic after surgery of cataract, the after endophthalmitis operative wound from the cefuroxime injection of intracameral was considerably lower. Although none of the 22 studies encompassed in the meta‐analysis had a study with a small sample size, it is nevertheless advisable to proceed with caution when analysing the results.