Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments. Materials and methods: The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brockow, Knut, Wang, Rosi, Mathes, Sonja, Bent, Rebekka, Faihs, Valentina, Eberlein, Bernadette, Darsow, Ulf, Biedermann, Tilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056446
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02373E
_version_ 1785022653751361536
author Brockow, Knut
Wang, Rosi
Mathes, Sonja
Bent, Rebekka
Faihs, Valentina
Eberlein, Bernadette
Darsow, Ulf
Biedermann, Tilo
author_facet Brockow, Knut
Wang, Rosi
Mathes, Sonja
Bent, Rebekka
Faihs, Valentina
Eberlein, Bernadette
Darsow, Ulf
Biedermann, Tilo
author_sort Brockow, Knut
collection PubMed
description Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments. Materials and methods: The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature. Results: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is needed for protection against severe infection. Skin reactions may arise with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Short-term general immune reactions and skin reactions are also possible upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, they recur in only a proportion of patients during follow-up vaccinations. Initial reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination fueled public fear. On the other hand, more recent epidemiologic data do not show a substantially increased anaphylaxis risk compared with other vaccines. Fear-related reactions may be essential for many “anaphylaxis” reports. In Germany, the flow chart developed by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) and Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) together with the allergological societies helps to care for patients with suspected “allergy history” safely and effectively. Through this, patients with increased risk of anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and their ingredients (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80) are identified. However, since only small amounts of these excipients are contained in mRNA vaccines, even some PEG-allergic patients can tolerate the vaccination. In Germany, an allergy test-guided procedure is recommended for high-risk patients, including an allergy history, prick tests, intradermal and basophil activation tests, and, if necessary, provocation tests. This also appears effective for anxiety reduction in patients with vaccination skepticism. To date, all of our patients have been able to be vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines without the occurrence of significant reactions. Conclusion: Many initial concerns about unexpected side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have not been confirmed. The flowchart and, in the case of suspicion of hypersensitivity, an allergy test-guided risk assessment helps to reduce patients’ fear of vaccination and enables safe vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10088874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100888742023-04-12 SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years? Brockow, Knut Wang, Rosi Mathes, Sonja Bent, Rebekka Faihs, Valentina Eberlein, Bernadette Darsow, Ulf Biedermann, Tilo Allergol Select Review Article Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments. Materials and methods: The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature. Results: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is needed for protection against severe infection. Skin reactions may arise with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Short-term general immune reactions and skin reactions are also possible upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, they recur in only a proportion of patients during follow-up vaccinations. Initial reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination fueled public fear. On the other hand, more recent epidemiologic data do not show a substantially increased anaphylaxis risk compared with other vaccines. Fear-related reactions may be essential for many “anaphylaxis” reports. In Germany, the flow chart developed by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) and Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) together with the allergological societies helps to care for patients with suspected “allergy history” safely and effectively. Through this, patients with increased risk of anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and their ingredients (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80) are identified. However, since only small amounts of these excipients are contained in mRNA vaccines, even some PEG-allergic patients can tolerate the vaccination. In Germany, an allergy test-guided procedure is recommended for high-risk patients, including an allergy history, prick tests, intradermal and basophil activation tests, and, if necessary, provocation tests. This also appears effective for anxiety reduction in patients with vaccination skepticism. To date, all of our patients have been able to be vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines without the occurrence of significant reactions. Conclusion: Many initial concerns about unexpected side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have not been confirmed. The flowchart and, in the case of suspicion of hypersensitivity, an allergy test-guided risk assessment helps to reduce patients’ fear of vaccination and enables safe vaccination. Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10088874/ /pubmed/37056446 http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02373E Text en © Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Brockow, Knut
Wang, Rosi
Mathes, Sonja
Bent, Rebekka
Faihs, Valentina
Eberlein, Bernadette
Darsow, Ulf
Biedermann, Tilo
SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title_full SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title_short SARS-CoV-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
title_sort sars-cov-2 and allergy – what have we learned after two and a half years?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056446
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02373E
work_keys_str_mv AT brockowknut sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT wangrosi sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT mathessonja sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT bentrebekka sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT faihsvalentina sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT eberleinbernadette sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT darsowulf sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears
AT biedermanntilo sarscov2andallergywhathavewelearnedaftertwoandahalfyears