Cargando…

Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Maltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla, Kjeldsen, Hans Christian, Milidou, Ioanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2178851
_version_ 1785022665109536768
author Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla
Kjeldsen, Hans Christian
Milidou, Ioanna
author_facet Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla
Kjeldsen, Hans Christian
Milidou, Ioanna
author_sort Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families. OBJECTIVE: How do general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) deal with suspected maltreatment in children below 18 years of age, and which factors influence them to report cases to social authorities. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed methods study set in general practice in Denmark. METHOD AND SUBJECTS: We combined data from a nationwide questionnaire with observations from five clinics and 20 interviews with GPs and PNs. We explored our data using the concept of uncertainty as a driver that shapes action and decision-making in general practice. RESULTS: Most GPs (94%) said they would discuss cases of suspected child maltreatment with social services, but in many cases they would prefer to discuss their suspicions with a colleague first (83%) – most likely where there are no clear-cut signs. The qualitative data added nuance to these findings by highlighting the difficulty of communicating across sectors, the importance of maintaining a connection with the child’s family, and practicing watchful waiting. CONCLUSION: General practice has an opportunity to act early in cases of suspected child maltreatment if uncertainty is accepted as a critical part of the process of reaching a diagnosis. Communication across sectors is key, as is support for GPs with suspicions and for families in need of help. KEY POINTS: GPs are often thought to underreport child maltreatment but despite low levels of reporting, this does not mean they ignore it. Building on the connection with the family, making follow appointments, and discussing suspicions with colleagues are typical of how GPs manage suspicions of child abuse. Accepting uncertainty as a condition of raising the alarm could help GPs to act quickly to support children at risk of abuse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10088924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100889242023-04-12 Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla Kjeldsen, Hans Christian Milidou, Ioanna Scand J Prim Health Care Original Articles BACKGROUND: Maltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families. OBJECTIVE: How do general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) deal with suspected maltreatment in children below 18 years of age, and which factors influence them to report cases to social authorities. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed methods study set in general practice in Denmark. METHOD AND SUBJECTS: We combined data from a nationwide questionnaire with observations from five clinics and 20 interviews with GPs and PNs. We explored our data using the concept of uncertainty as a driver that shapes action and decision-making in general practice. RESULTS: Most GPs (94%) said they would discuss cases of suspected child maltreatment with social services, but in many cases they would prefer to discuss their suspicions with a colleague first (83%) – most likely where there are no clear-cut signs. The qualitative data added nuance to these findings by highlighting the difficulty of communicating across sectors, the importance of maintaining a connection with the child’s family, and practicing watchful waiting. CONCLUSION: General practice has an opportunity to act early in cases of suspected child maltreatment if uncertainty is accepted as a critical part of the process of reaching a diagnosis. Communication across sectors is key, as is support for GPs with suspicions and for families in need of help. KEY POINTS: GPs are often thought to underreport child maltreatment but despite low levels of reporting, this does not mean they ignore it. Building on the connection with the family, making follow appointments, and discussing suspicions with colleagues are typical of how GPs manage suspicions of child abuse. Accepting uncertainty as a condition of raising the alarm could help GPs to act quickly to support children at risk of abuse. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10088924/ /pubmed/37035862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2178851 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hoffmann Merrild, Camilla
Kjeldsen, Hans Christian
Milidou, Ioanna
Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title_full Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title_short Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
title_sort management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37035862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2178851
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannmerrildcamilla managementofchildmaltreatmentsuspicionsingeneralpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT kjeldsenhanschristian managementofchildmaltreatmentsuspicionsingeneralpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT milidouioanna managementofchildmaltreatmentsuspicionsingeneralpracticeamixedmethodsstudy