Cargando…

Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Cone beam computed tomography is widely used as a mode of investigation in the field of dentistry. Although presenting a three-dimensional picture of head and neck structures it does carry drawbacks in the form of artifacts which not only degrade image quality but a repeat of the radio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bali, Harleen, Luitel, Abhinaya, Upadhyaya, Chandan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37203913
http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.7949
_version_ 1785022686728028160
author Bali, Harleen
Luitel, Abhinaya
Upadhyaya, Chandan
author_facet Bali, Harleen
Luitel, Abhinaya
Upadhyaya, Chandan
author_sort Bali, Harleen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cone beam computed tomography is widely used as a mode of investigation in the field of dentistry. Although presenting a three-dimensional picture of head and neck structures it does carry drawbacks in the form of artifacts which not only degrade image quality but a repeat of the radiograph leading the patient to radiation exposure again. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of artifacts among cone beam computed tomography images of patients visiting tertiary care centre. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on cone beam computed tomography images of patients in the archives of dental radiology at the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology wherein all cone beam computed tomography radiographs of patients after taking an ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee (Approval number: 13/22) from 1 January 2019 to 19 March 2022 were included in the study. The study included 780 image of patients. Convenience sampling was used. The artifacts when present was noted and categorised as inherent artifacts, procedure-related artifacts, introduced artifacts and patient motion artifacts. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. RESULTS: Among 780 cone beam computed tomography image patients, artifacts were seen in 665 (85.25%) (82.76-87.74, 95% Confidence Interval) study images. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of artifacts among cone beam computed tomography images of patients is similar to the studies done in similar settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10089052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100890522023-04-12 Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study Bali, Harleen Luitel, Abhinaya Upadhyaya, Chandan JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc Original Article INTRODUCTION: Cone beam computed tomography is widely used as a mode of investigation in the field of dentistry. Although presenting a three-dimensional picture of head and neck structures it does carry drawbacks in the form of artifacts which not only degrade image quality but a repeat of the radiograph leading the patient to radiation exposure again. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of artifacts among cone beam computed tomography images of patients visiting tertiary care centre. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on cone beam computed tomography images of patients in the archives of dental radiology at the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology wherein all cone beam computed tomography radiographs of patients after taking an ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee (Approval number: 13/22) from 1 January 2019 to 19 March 2022 were included in the study. The study included 780 image of patients. Convenience sampling was used. The artifacts when present was noted and categorised as inherent artifacts, procedure-related artifacts, introduced artifacts and patient motion artifacts. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. RESULTS: Among 780 cone beam computed tomography image patients, artifacts were seen in 665 (85.25%) (82.76-87.74, 95% Confidence Interval) study images. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of artifacts among cone beam computed tomography images of patients is similar to the studies done in similar settings. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2023-01 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10089052/ /pubmed/37203913 http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.7949 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bali, Harleen
Luitel, Abhinaya
Upadhyaya, Chandan
Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_full Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_short Artifacts among Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images of Patients of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
title_sort artifacts among cone beam computed tomography images of patients of tertiary care centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37203913
http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.7949
work_keys_str_mv AT baliharleen artifactsamongconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesofpatientsoftertiarycarecentreadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT luitelabhinaya artifactsamongconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesofpatientsoftertiarycarecentreadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT upadhyayachandan artifactsamongconebeamcomputedtomographyimagesofpatientsoftertiarycarecentreadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy