Cargando…

Right hemispheric structural connectivity and poststroke language recovery

Poststroke aphasia typically results from brain damage to the left‐lateralized language network. The contribution of the right‐lateralized homologues in aphasia recovery remains equivocal. In this longitudinal observational study, we specifically investigated the role of right hemisphere structural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sihvonen, Aleksi J., Vadinova, Veronika, Garden, Kimberley L., Meinzer, Marcus, Roxbury, Tracy, O'Brien, Kate, Copland, David, McMahon, Katie L., Brownsett, Sonia L. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26252
Descripción
Sumario:Poststroke aphasia typically results from brain damage to the left‐lateralized language network. The contribution of the right‐lateralized homologues in aphasia recovery remains equivocal. In this longitudinal observational study, we specifically investigated the role of right hemisphere structural connectome in aphasia recovery. Twenty‐two patients with aphasia after a left hemispheric stroke underwent comprehensive language assessment at the early subacute and chronic stages. A novel structural connectometry approach, using multi‐shell diffusion‐weighted MRI data collected at the early subacute stage, was used to evaluate the relationship between right hemisphere white matter connectome and language production and comprehension abilities at early subacute stage. Moreover, we evaluated the relationship between early subacute right hemisphere white matter connectome and longitudinal change in language production and comprehension abilities. All results were corrected for multiple comparisons. Connectometry analyses revealed negative associations between early subacute stage right hemisphere structural connectivity and language production, both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (p (FDR) < .0125). In turn, only positive associations between right hemisphere structural connectivity and language comprehension were observed, both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (p (FDR) < .0125). Interhemispheric connectivity was highly associated with comprehension scores. Our results shed light on the discordant interpretations of previous findings, by providing evidence that while some right hemisphere white matter pathways may make a maladaptive contribution to the recovery of language, other pathways support the recovery of language, especially comprehension abilities.