Cargando…
Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) can be useful in the assessment of changes in cardiac function and hemodynamic status; however, the benefits of PAC in the management of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37065575 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1139 |
_version_ | 1785022854051397632 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jinho Lee, Jung-Bok Kim, Ah-Ram Hyun, Junho Lee, Sang-Eun Kim, Min-Seok |
author_facet | Lee, Jinho Lee, Jung-Bok Kim, Ah-Ram Hyun, Junho Lee, Sang-Eun Kim, Min-Seok |
author_sort | Lee, Jinho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) can be useful in the assessment of changes in cardiac function and hemodynamic status; however, the benefits of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock are not known well. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials, comparing in-hospital mortality between PAC and non-PAC groups of cardiogenic shock patients with various underlying causes. Articles were obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We reviewed titles, abstracts, and full articles and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework. We used a random-effects model to compare studies in terms of in-hospital mortality findings. RESULTS: We included twelve articles in our meta-analysis. Mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock was not significantly different between the PAC and the non-PAC groups [risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.02, I(2)=100%, P<0.01]. Two studies investigating cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.87, I(2)=45%, P=0.18). Six studies investigating cardiogenic shock of any cause determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72–0.97, I(2)=99%, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the PAC and non-PAC groups of patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81–1.25, I(2)=99%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated no significant association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients managed for cardiogenic shock. The use of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, but there was no association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute coronary syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10089870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100898702023-04-13 Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Jinho Lee, Jung-Bok Kim, Ah-Ram Hyun, Junho Lee, Sang-Eun Kim, Min-Seok J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) can be useful in the assessment of changes in cardiac function and hemodynamic status; however, the benefits of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock are not known well. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials, comparing in-hospital mortality between PAC and non-PAC groups of cardiogenic shock patients with various underlying causes. Articles were obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We reviewed titles, abstracts, and full articles and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework. We used a random-effects model to compare studies in terms of in-hospital mortality findings. RESULTS: We included twelve articles in our meta-analysis. Mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock was not significantly different between the PAC and the non-PAC groups [risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.02, I(2)=100%, P<0.01]. Two studies investigating cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.87, I(2)=45%, P=0.18). Six studies investigating cardiogenic shock of any cause determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72–0.97, I(2)=99%, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the PAC and non-PAC groups of patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81–1.25, I(2)=99%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated no significant association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients managed for cardiogenic shock. The use of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, but there was no association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute coronary syndrome. AME Publishing Company 2023-03-02 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10089870/ /pubmed/37065575 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1139 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jinho Lee, Jung-Bok Kim, Ah-Ram Hyun, Junho Lee, Sang-Eun Kim, Min-Seok Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37065575 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejinho effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leejungbok effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimahram effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hyunjunho effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leesangeun effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimminseok effectivenessofpulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringforpatientswithcardiogenicshockofvariouscausesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |