Effect of initiative pulmonary bullectomy on the risk of post-operative pneumothorax in patients with esophageal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pneumothorax can lead to additional invasive intervention and extended hospitalization. The effect of initiative pulmonary bullectomy (IPB) during the esophagectomy on preventing postoperative pneumothorax remains controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IPB in patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal carcinoma complicated by ipsilateral pulmonary bullae. METHODS: Data from 654 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent MIE from January 2013 to May 2020 were retrospectively collected. A total of 109 patients who had a definite diagnosis of ipsilateral pulmonary bullae were recruited and classified into two groups: the IPB group and the control group (CG). Propensity score matching (PSM, match ratio =1:1), incorporating preoperative clinical features, was used to compare the perioperative complications and analyze efficacy and safety between IPB and control group. RESULTS: The incidences of postoperative pneumothorax in the IPB and control groups was 3.13% and 40.63% respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.001). Logistic analyses indicated that removing ipsilateral bullae was associated with a lower risk (OR 0.030; 95% CI: 0.003–0.338; P=0.005) of incident postoperative pneumothorax. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the incidence of anastomotic leakage (6.25% vs. 3.13%, P=1.000), arrhythmia (3.13% vs. 3.13%, P=1.000), chylothorax (0% vs. 3.13%, P=1.000) and other common complications. CONCLUSIONS: In esophageal cancer patients with ipsilateral pulmonary bullae, IPB performed in the same anesthesia process is an effective and safe method for the prevention of postoperative pneumothorax, allowing for a shorter postoperative rehabilitation time, and it does not exert unfavorable effects on complications.