Cargando…
How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices
PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7 |
_version_ | 1785022877887627264 |
---|---|
author | Rutherford, Claudia Ju, Angela Kim, Bora Wiltink, Lisette Acret, Louise White, Kate |
author_facet | Rutherford, Claudia Ju, Angela Kim, Bora Wiltink, Lisette Acret, Louise White, Kate |
author_sort | Rutherford, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives. METHODS: This qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews. RESULTS: We interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians’ worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care. CONCLUSIONS: To improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10090022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100900222023-04-13 How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices Rutherford, Claudia Ju, Angela Kim, Bora Wiltink, Lisette Acret, Louise White, Kate Support Care Cancer Research PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives. METHODS: This qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews. RESULTS: We interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians’ worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care. CONCLUSIONS: To improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10090022/ /pubmed/37041401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Rutherford, Claudia Ju, Angela Kim, Bora Wiltink, Lisette Acret, Louise White, Kate How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title | How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title_full | How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title_fullStr | How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title_full_unstemmed | How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title_short | How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
title_sort | how consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rutherfordclaudia howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices AT juangela howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices AT kimbora howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices AT wiltinklisette howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices AT acretlouise howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices AT whitekate howconsequencesofcolorectalcancertreatmentaremanagedaqualitativestudyofstakeholderexperiencesaboutsupportivecareandcurrentpractices |