Cargando…
Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series
BACKGROUND: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of apical prolapse. Because intraoperative exposure of the sacrospinous ligament is difficult, SSLF is difficult. The aim of our article is to determine the safety and feasibility of s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37065998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622 |
_version_ | 1785022951770292224 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ye Wang, Chao Wang, Xianjing Yan, Rongrong Chu, Lei Chen, Xinliang |
author_facet | Liu, Ye Wang, Chao Wang, Xianjing Yan, Rongrong Chu, Lei Chen, Xinliang |
author_sort | Liu, Ye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of apical prolapse. Because intraoperative exposure of the sacrospinous ligament is difficult, SSLF is difficult. The aim of our article is to determine the safety and feasibility of single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic SSLF for apical prolapse. METHODS: This single-center, single-surgeon case series study included 9 patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) III or IV apical prolapse who underwent single-port laparoscopic SSLF. Additionally, transobturator tension-free vaginal tap (TVT-O) was performed in 2 patients, and anterior pelvic mesh reconstruction was performed in 1 patient. RESULTS: The operative time ranged from 75 to 105 (mean, 88.9 ± 10.2) min, and blood loss ranged from 25 to 100 (mean, 43.3 ± 22.6) ml. No serious operative complications, blood transfusions, visceral injuries, or postoperative gluteal pain were reported for these patients. After 2–4 months of follow-up, no recurrence of POP, gluteal pain, urinary retention/incontinence, or other complications was observed. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal single-port SSLF is a safe, effective, and easy-to-master operation for apical prolapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10090387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100903872023-04-13 Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series Liu, Ye Wang, Chao Wang, Xianjing Yan, Rongrong Chu, Lei Chen, Xinliang Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of apical prolapse. Because intraoperative exposure of the sacrospinous ligament is difficult, SSLF is difficult. The aim of our article is to determine the safety and feasibility of single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic SSLF for apical prolapse. METHODS: This single-center, single-surgeon case series study included 9 patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) III or IV apical prolapse who underwent single-port laparoscopic SSLF. Additionally, transobturator tension-free vaginal tap (TVT-O) was performed in 2 patients, and anterior pelvic mesh reconstruction was performed in 1 patient. RESULTS: The operative time ranged from 75 to 105 (mean, 88.9 ± 10.2) min, and blood loss ranged from 25 to 100 (mean, 43.3 ± 22.6) ml. No serious operative complications, blood transfusions, visceral injuries, or postoperative gluteal pain were reported for these patients. After 2–4 months of follow-up, no recurrence of POP, gluteal pain, urinary retention/incontinence, or other complications was observed. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal single-port SSLF is a safe, effective, and easy-to-master operation for apical prolapse. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10090387/ /pubmed/37065998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622 Text en © 2023 Liu, Wang, Wang, Yan, Chu and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Liu, Ye Wang, Chao Wang, Xianjing Yan, Rongrong Chu, Lei Chen, Xinliang Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title | Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title_full | Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title_fullStr | Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title_short | Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series |
title_sort | case report: transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: a single-center case series |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37065998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuye casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries AT wangchao casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries AT wangxianjing casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries AT yanrongrong casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries AT chulei casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries AT chenxinliang casereporttransvaginalsingleportextraperitoneallaparoscopicsacrospinousligamentfixationforapicalprolapseasinglecentercaseseries |