Cargando…

Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice

IMPORTANCE: Evaluation of trainees in graduate medical education training programs using Milestones has been in place since 2013. It is not known whether trainees who have lower ratings during the last year of training go on to have concerns related to interactions with patients in posttraining prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Misop, Hamstra, Stanley J., Hogan, Sean O., Holmboe, Eric, Harris, Kelly, Wallen, Eric, Hickson, Gerald, Terhune, Kyla P., Brady, Donald W., Trock, Bruce, Yamazaki, Kenji, Bienstock, Jessica L., Domenico, Henry J., Cooper, William O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7588
_version_ 1785023096268259328
author Han, Misop
Hamstra, Stanley J.
Hogan, Sean O.
Holmboe, Eric
Harris, Kelly
Wallen, Eric
Hickson, Gerald
Terhune, Kyla P.
Brady, Donald W.
Trock, Bruce
Yamazaki, Kenji
Bienstock, Jessica L.
Domenico, Henry J.
Cooper, William O.
author_facet Han, Misop
Hamstra, Stanley J.
Hogan, Sean O.
Holmboe, Eric
Harris, Kelly
Wallen, Eric
Hickson, Gerald
Terhune, Kyla P.
Brady, Donald W.
Trock, Bruce
Yamazaki, Kenji
Bienstock, Jessica L.
Domenico, Henry J.
Cooper, William O.
author_sort Han, Misop
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Evaluation of trainees in graduate medical education training programs using Milestones has been in place since 2013. It is not known whether trainees who have lower ratings during the last year of training go on to have concerns related to interactions with patients in posttraining practice. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between resident Milestone ratings and posttraining patient complaints. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included physicians who completed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited programs between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, and worked at a site that participated in the national Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS) program for at least 1 year. Milestone ratings from ACGME training programs and patient complaint data from PARS were collected. Data analysis was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023. EXPOSURES: Lowest professionalism (P) and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) Milestones ratings 6 months prior to the end of training. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: PARS year 1 index scores, based on recency and severity of complaints. RESULTS: The cohort included 9340 physicians with median (IQR) age of 33 (31-35) years; 4516 (48.4%) were women physicians. Overall, 7001 (75.0%) had a PARS year 1 index score of 0, 2023 (21.7%) had a score of 1 to 20 (moderate), and 316 (3.4%) had a score of 21 or greater (high). Among physicians in the lowest Milestones group, 34 of 716 (4.7%) had high PARS year 1 index scores, while 105 of 3617 (2.9%) with Milestone ratings of 4.0 (proficient), had high PARS year 1 index scores. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, physicians in the 2 lowest Milestones rating groups (0-2.5 and 3.0-3.5) were statistically significantly more likely to have higher PARS year 1 index scores than the reference group with Milestones ratings of 4.0 (0-2.5 group: odds ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.0-1.5]; 3.0-3.5 group: odds ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.3]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, trainees with low Milestone ratings in P and ICS near the end of residency were at increased risk for patient complaints in their early posttraining independent physician practice. Trainees with lower Milestone ratings in P and ICS may need more support during graduate medical education training or in the early part of their posttraining practice career.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100911632023-04-13 Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice Han, Misop Hamstra, Stanley J. Hogan, Sean O. Holmboe, Eric Harris, Kelly Wallen, Eric Hickson, Gerald Terhune, Kyla P. Brady, Donald W. Trock, Bruce Yamazaki, Kenji Bienstock, Jessica L. Domenico, Henry J. Cooper, William O. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Evaluation of trainees in graduate medical education training programs using Milestones has been in place since 2013. It is not known whether trainees who have lower ratings during the last year of training go on to have concerns related to interactions with patients in posttraining practice. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between resident Milestone ratings and posttraining patient complaints. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included physicians who completed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited programs between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, and worked at a site that participated in the national Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS) program for at least 1 year. Milestone ratings from ACGME training programs and patient complaint data from PARS were collected. Data analysis was conducted from March 2022 to February 2023. EXPOSURES: Lowest professionalism (P) and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) Milestones ratings 6 months prior to the end of training. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: PARS year 1 index scores, based on recency and severity of complaints. RESULTS: The cohort included 9340 physicians with median (IQR) age of 33 (31-35) years; 4516 (48.4%) were women physicians. Overall, 7001 (75.0%) had a PARS year 1 index score of 0, 2023 (21.7%) had a score of 1 to 20 (moderate), and 316 (3.4%) had a score of 21 or greater (high). Among physicians in the lowest Milestones group, 34 of 716 (4.7%) had high PARS year 1 index scores, while 105 of 3617 (2.9%) with Milestone ratings of 4.0 (proficient), had high PARS year 1 index scores. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, physicians in the 2 lowest Milestones rating groups (0-2.5 and 3.0-3.5) were statistically significantly more likely to have higher PARS year 1 index scores than the reference group with Milestones ratings of 4.0 (0-2.5 group: odds ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.0-1.5]; 3.0-3.5 group: odds ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.3]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, trainees with low Milestone ratings in P and ICS near the end of residency were at increased risk for patient complaints in their early posttraining independent physician practice. Trainees with lower Milestone ratings in P and ICS may need more support during graduate medical education training or in the early part of their posttraining practice career. American Medical Association 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10091163/ /pubmed/37040112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7588 Text en Copyright 2023 Han M et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Han, Misop
Hamstra, Stanley J.
Hogan, Sean O.
Holmboe, Eric
Harris, Kelly
Wallen, Eric
Hickson, Gerald
Terhune, Kyla P.
Brady, Donald W.
Trock, Bruce
Yamazaki, Kenji
Bienstock, Jessica L.
Domenico, Henry J.
Cooper, William O.
Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title_full Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title_fullStr Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title_full_unstemmed Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title_short Trainee Physician Milestone Ratings and Patient Complaints in Early Posttraining Practice
title_sort trainee physician milestone ratings and patient complaints in early posttraining practice
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7588
work_keys_str_mv AT hanmisop traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT hamstrastanleyj traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT hoganseano traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT holmboeeric traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT harriskelly traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT walleneric traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT hicksongerald traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT terhunekylap traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT bradydonaldw traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT trockbruce traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT yamazakikenji traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT bienstockjessical traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT domenicohenryj traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice
AT cooperwilliamo traineephysicianmilestoneratingsandpatientcomplaintsinearlyposttrainingpractice