Cargando…
Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer
Photochemistry and photophysics processes involve structures far from equilibrium. In these reactions, there is often strong coupling between nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom. For first-row transition metals, Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) is a sensitive probe of electronic structure...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2cp05671b |
_version_ | 1785023120476733440 |
---|---|
author | Rogvall, Johanna Singh, Roshan Vacher, Morgane Lundberg, Marcus |
author_facet | Rogvall, Johanna Singh, Roshan Vacher, Morgane Lundberg, Marcus |
author_sort | Rogvall, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Photochemistry and photophysics processes involve structures far from equilibrium. In these reactions, there is often strong coupling between nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom. For first-row transition metals, Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) is a sensitive probe of electronic structure due to the direct overlap between the valence orbitals and the 3p hole in the final state. Here the sensitivity of Kβ mainline (Kβ(1,3)) XES to structural dynamics is analyzed by simulating spectral changes along the excited state dynamics of an iron photosensitizer [Fe(II)(bmip)(2)](2+) [bmip = 2,6-bis(3-methyl-imidazole-1-ylidine)-pyridine], using both restricted active space (RAS) multiconfigurational wavefunction theory and a one-electron orbital-energy approach in density-functional theory (1-DFT). Both methods predict a spectral blue-shift with increasing metal–ligand distance, which changes the emission intensity for any given detection energy. These results support the suggestion that the [Fe(II)(bmip)(2)](2+) femtosecond Kβ XES signal shows oscillations due to coherent wavepacket dynamics. Based on the RAS results, the sensitivity to structural dynamics is twice as high for Kβ compared to Kα, with the drawback of a lower signal-to-noise ratio. Kβ sensitivity is favored by a larger spectral blue-shift with increasing metal–ligand distance and larger changes in spectral shape. Comparing the two simulations methods, 1-DFT predicts smaller energy shifts and lower sensitivity, likely due to missing final-state effects. The simulations can be used to design and interpret XES probes of non-equilibrium structures to gain mechanistic insights in photocatalysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10091363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100913632023-04-13 Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer Rogvall, Johanna Singh, Roshan Vacher, Morgane Lundberg, Marcus Phys Chem Chem Phys Chemistry Photochemistry and photophysics processes involve structures far from equilibrium. In these reactions, there is often strong coupling between nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom. For first-row transition metals, Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) is a sensitive probe of electronic structure due to the direct overlap between the valence orbitals and the 3p hole in the final state. Here the sensitivity of Kβ mainline (Kβ(1,3)) XES to structural dynamics is analyzed by simulating spectral changes along the excited state dynamics of an iron photosensitizer [Fe(II)(bmip)(2)](2+) [bmip = 2,6-bis(3-methyl-imidazole-1-ylidine)-pyridine], using both restricted active space (RAS) multiconfigurational wavefunction theory and a one-electron orbital-energy approach in density-functional theory (1-DFT). Both methods predict a spectral blue-shift with increasing metal–ligand distance, which changes the emission intensity for any given detection energy. These results support the suggestion that the [Fe(II)(bmip)(2)](2+) femtosecond Kβ XES signal shows oscillations due to coherent wavepacket dynamics. Based on the RAS results, the sensitivity to structural dynamics is twice as high for Kβ compared to Kα, with the drawback of a lower signal-to-noise ratio. Kβ sensitivity is favored by a larger spectral blue-shift with increasing metal–ligand distance and larger changes in spectral shape. Comparing the two simulations methods, 1-DFT predicts smaller energy shifts and lower sensitivity, likely due to missing final-state effects. The simulations can be used to design and interpret XES probes of non-equilibrium structures to gain mechanistic insights in photocatalysis. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10091363/ /pubmed/37016943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2cp05671b Text en This journal is © the Owner Societies https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Rogvall, Johanna Singh, Roshan Vacher, Morgane Lundberg, Marcus Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title | Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title_full | Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title_short | Sensitivity of Kβ mainline X-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
title_sort | sensitivity of kβ mainline x-ray emission to structural dynamics in iron photosensitizer |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2cp05671b |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogvalljohanna sensitivityofkbmainlinexrayemissiontostructuraldynamicsinironphotosensitizer AT singhroshan sensitivityofkbmainlinexrayemissiontostructuraldynamicsinironphotosensitizer AT vachermorgane sensitivityofkbmainlinexrayemissiontostructuraldynamicsinironphotosensitizer AT lundbergmarcus sensitivityofkbmainlinexrayemissiontostructuraldynamicsinironphotosensitizer |