Cargando…
Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis
BACKGROUND: It has previously been observed that the prognostic value of tumor size varied according to different stages patients enrolled in gastric cancer. We aimed to investigate the influence of T stage on the prognostic and predicting value of tumor size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 13,585...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z |
_version_ | 1785023167387926528 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Xueyan Gao, Beibei Pang, Suya Wang, Zeyu Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Weijun Lin, Rong |
author_facet | Xiao, Xueyan Gao, Beibei Pang, Suya Wang, Zeyu Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Weijun Lin, Rong |
author_sort | Xiao, Xueyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has previously been observed that the prognostic value of tumor size varied according to different stages patients enrolled in gastric cancer. We aimed to investigate the influence of T stage on the prognostic and predicting value of tumor size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 13,585 patients with stage I–III gastric cancer were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis stratified by T stage were performed. C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve were applied to assess discrimination ability of tumor size and other factors. Nomograms were constructed to further assess the performance of tumor size in a specific model. Calibration ability, discrimination ability, reclassification ability and clinical benefits were executed to judge the performance of models. RESULTS: Stratified analyses according to T stage illustrated that with the increase of T stage, the effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) significantly decreased. Moreover, tumor size showed superior discrimination ability in T1 gastric cancer, outperformed other prognostic factors in predicting both CSS (C-index: 0.666, AUC: 0.687) and OS (C-index: 0.635, AUC: 0.660). The cox regression model included tumor size showed better performance than the model excluded tumor size in every aspect. CONCLUSION: T stage had a negative impact on the predicting value of tumor size. Tumor size showed significant prognostic value in T1 gastric cancer, which may be effective in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10091636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100916362023-04-13 Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis Xiao, Xueyan Gao, Beibei Pang, Suya Wang, Zeyu Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Weijun Lin, Rong BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: It has previously been observed that the prognostic value of tumor size varied according to different stages patients enrolled in gastric cancer. We aimed to investigate the influence of T stage on the prognostic and predicting value of tumor size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 13,585 patients with stage I–III gastric cancer were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis stratified by T stage were performed. C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve were applied to assess discrimination ability of tumor size and other factors. Nomograms were constructed to further assess the performance of tumor size in a specific model. Calibration ability, discrimination ability, reclassification ability and clinical benefits were executed to judge the performance of models. RESULTS: Stratified analyses according to T stage illustrated that with the increase of T stage, the effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) significantly decreased. Moreover, tumor size showed superior discrimination ability in T1 gastric cancer, outperformed other prognostic factors in predicting both CSS (C-index: 0.666, AUC: 0.687) and OS (C-index: 0.635, AUC: 0.660). The cox regression model included tumor size showed better performance than the model excluded tumor size in every aspect. CONCLUSION: T stage had a negative impact on the predicting value of tumor size. Tumor size showed significant prognostic value in T1 gastric cancer, which may be effective in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z. BioMed Central 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10091636/ /pubmed/37046218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Xiao, Xueyan Gao, Beibei Pang, Suya Wang, Zeyu Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Weijun Lin, Rong Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title | Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title_full | Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title_fullStr | Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title_short | Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis |
title_sort | tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in t1 gastric cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (seer) database analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoxueyan tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT gaobeibei tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT pangsuya tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT wangzeyu tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT jiangweiwei tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT wangweijun tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis AT linrong tumorsizeasasignificantprognosticfactorint1gastriccancerasurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabaseanalysis |