Cargando…

The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects

Actinopterygii makes up half of living vertebrate diversity, and study of fossil members during their Palaeozoic rise to dominance has a long history of descriptive work. Although research interest into Palaeozoic actinopterygians has increased in recent years, broader patterns of diversity and dive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Struan, Dunne, Emma M., Fasey, Sophie A., Giles, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12907
_version_ 1785023197184262144
author Henderson, Struan
Dunne, Emma M.
Fasey, Sophie A.
Giles, Sam
author_facet Henderson, Struan
Dunne, Emma M.
Fasey, Sophie A.
Giles, Sam
author_sort Henderson, Struan
collection PubMed
description Actinopterygii makes up half of living vertebrate diversity, and study of fossil members during their Palaeozoic rise to dominance has a long history of descriptive work. Although research interest into Palaeozoic actinopterygians has increased in recent years, broader patterns of diversity and diversity dynamics remain critically understudied. Past studies have investigated macroevolutionary trends in Palaeozoic actinopterygians in a piecemeal fashion, variably using existing compendia of vertebrates or literature‐based searches. Here, we present a comprehensive occurrence‐based dataset of actinopterygians spanning the whole of the Palaeozoic. We use this to produce the first through‐Palaeozoic trends in genus and species counts for Actinopterygii. Diversity through time generally tracks metrics for sampling, while major taxonomic problems pervading the Palaeozoic actinopterygian record obscure diversity trends. Many described species are concentrated in several particularly problematic ‘waste‐basket’ genera, hiding considerable morphological and taxonomic diversity. This taxonomic confusion also feeds into a limited understanding of phylogenetic relationships. A heavy sampling bias towards Europe and North America exists in both occurrence databases and available phylogenetic matrices, with other regions underrepresented despite yielding important data. Scrutiny of the extent to which spatial biases influence the actinopterygian record is lacking, as is research on other forms of bias. Low richness in some time periods may be linked to geological biases, while the effects of taphonomic biases on Palaeozoic actinopterygians have not yet been investigated. Efforts are already underway both to redescribe poorly defined taxa and to describe taxa from underrepresented regions, helping to address taxonomic issues and accuracy of occurrence data. New methods of sampling standardisation utilising up‐to‐date occurrence databases will be critical in teasing apart biological changes in diversity and those resulting from bias. Lastly, continued phylogenetic work will enable the use of phylogenetic comparative methods to elucidate the origins of actinopterygian biogeography and subsequent patterns of radiation throughout their rise to dominate aquatic faunas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100917702023-04-13 The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects Henderson, Struan Dunne, Emma M. Fasey, Sophie A. Giles, Sam Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Actinopterygii makes up half of living vertebrate diversity, and study of fossil members during their Palaeozoic rise to dominance has a long history of descriptive work. Although research interest into Palaeozoic actinopterygians has increased in recent years, broader patterns of diversity and diversity dynamics remain critically understudied. Past studies have investigated macroevolutionary trends in Palaeozoic actinopterygians in a piecemeal fashion, variably using existing compendia of vertebrates or literature‐based searches. Here, we present a comprehensive occurrence‐based dataset of actinopterygians spanning the whole of the Palaeozoic. We use this to produce the first through‐Palaeozoic trends in genus and species counts for Actinopterygii. Diversity through time generally tracks metrics for sampling, while major taxonomic problems pervading the Palaeozoic actinopterygian record obscure diversity trends. Many described species are concentrated in several particularly problematic ‘waste‐basket’ genera, hiding considerable morphological and taxonomic diversity. This taxonomic confusion also feeds into a limited understanding of phylogenetic relationships. A heavy sampling bias towards Europe and North America exists in both occurrence databases and available phylogenetic matrices, with other regions underrepresented despite yielding important data. Scrutiny of the extent to which spatial biases influence the actinopterygian record is lacking, as is research on other forms of bias. Low richness in some time periods may be linked to geological biases, while the effects of taphonomic biases on Palaeozoic actinopterygians have not yet been investigated. Efforts are already underway both to redescribe poorly defined taxa and to describe taxa from underrepresented regions, helping to address taxonomic issues and accuracy of occurrence data. New methods of sampling standardisation utilising up‐to‐date occurrence databases will be critical in teasing apart biological changes in diversity and those resulting from bias. Lastly, continued phylogenetic work will enable the use of phylogenetic comparative methods to elucidate the origins of actinopterygian biogeography and subsequent patterns of radiation throughout their rise to dominate aquatic faunas. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-10-03 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10091770/ /pubmed/36192821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12907 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Henderson, Struan
Dunne, Emma M.
Fasey, Sophie A.
Giles, Sam
The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title_full The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title_fullStr The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title_full_unstemmed The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title_short The early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (Actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
title_sort early diversification of ray‐finned fishes (actinopterygii): hypotheses, challenges and future prospects
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12907
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonstruan theearlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT dunneemmam theearlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT faseysophiea theearlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT gilessam theearlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT hendersonstruan earlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT dunneemmam earlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT faseysophiea earlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects
AT gilessam earlydiversificationofrayfinnedfishesactinopterygiihypotheseschallengesandfutureprospects