Cargando…

Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus

Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Spri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu, Carragher, Kevin, Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam, Ritchie, Phyllis, Scott, Hyman, Li, Hong, Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191
_version_ 1785023202490056704
author Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu
Carragher, Kevin
Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam
Ritchie, Phyllis
Scott, Hyman
Li, Hong
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu
Carragher, Kevin
Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam
Ritchie, Phyllis
Scott, Hyman
Li, Hong
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu
collection PubMed
description Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Springs, CA. Finally, using prespecified search terms, we conducted a systematic rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science online databases of studies reporting the performance of oral pharyngeal or saliva‐based tests for the monkeypox virus. The assay showed in silico inclusivity of 100% for 97 strains of monkeypox virus, with an analytic sensitivity of 250 copies/ml, and 100% agreement compared to known positive and negative specimens. Clinical testing identified 22 cases of monkeypox among 132 individuals (16.7%), of which 16 (72.7%) reported symptoms, 4 (18.2%) without a rash at the time of testing. Of an additional 18 patients with positive lesion tests, 16 (88.9%) had positive saliva tests. Our systematic review identified six studies; 100% of tests on oropharyngeal specimens from 23 patients agreed with the PCR test result of a lesion. Saliva‐based PCR tests are potential tools for case identification, and further evaluation of the performance of such tests is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100917912023-04-13 Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu Carragher, Kevin Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam Ritchie, Phyllis Scott, Hyman Li, Hong Klausner, Jeffrey D. J Med Virol Short Communications Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Springs, CA. Finally, using prespecified search terms, we conducted a systematic rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science online databases of studies reporting the performance of oral pharyngeal or saliva‐based tests for the monkeypox virus. The assay showed in silico inclusivity of 100% for 97 strains of monkeypox virus, with an analytic sensitivity of 250 copies/ml, and 100% agreement compared to known positive and negative specimens. Clinical testing identified 22 cases of monkeypox among 132 individuals (16.7%), of which 16 (72.7%) reported symptoms, 4 (18.2%) without a rash at the time of testing. Of an additional 18 patients with positive lesion tests, 16 (88.9%) had positive saliva tests. Our systematic review identified six studies; 100% of tests on oropharyngeal specimens from 23 patients agreed with the PCR test result of a lesion. Saliva‐based PCR tests are potential tools for case identification, and further evaluation of the performance of such tests is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10091791/ /pubmed/36183189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu
Carragher, Kevin
Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam
Ritchie, Phyllis
Scott, Hyman
Li, Hong
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title_full Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title_fullStr Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title_short Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
title_sort laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191
work_keys_str_mv AT allanblitzlaotzu laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT carragherkevin laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT sukhijacohenadam laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT ritchiephyllis laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT scotthyman laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT lihong laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus
AT klausnerjeffreyd laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus