Cargando…
Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus
Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Spri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191 |
_version_ | 1785023202490056704 |
---|---|
author | Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu Carragher, Kevin Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam Ritchie, Phyllis Scott, Hyman Li, Hong Klausner, Jeffrey D. |
author_facet | Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu Carragher, Kevin Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam Ritchie, Phyllis Scott, Hyman Li, Hong Klausner, Jeffrey D. |
author_sort | Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Springs, CA. Finally, using prespecified search terms, we conducted a systematic rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science online databases of studies reporting the performance of oral pharyngeal or saliva‐based tests for the monkeypox virus. The assay showed in silico inclusivity of 100% for 97 strains of monkeypox virus, with an analytic sensitivity of 250 copies/ml, and 100% agreement compared to known positive and negative specimens. Clinical testing identified 22 cases of monkeypox among 132 individuals (16.7%), of which 16 (72.7%) reported symptoms, 4 (18.2%) without a rash at the time of testing. Of an additional 18 patients with positive lesion tests, 16 (88.9%) had positive saliva tests. Our systematic review identified six studies; 100% of tests on oropharyngeal specimens from 23 patients agreed with the PCR test result of a lesion. Saliva‐based PCR tests are potential tools for case identification, and further evaluation of the performance of such tests is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10091791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100917912023-04-13 Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu Carragher, Kevin Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam Ritchie, Phyllis Scott, Hyman Li, Hong Klausner, Jeffrey D. J Med Virol Short Communications Improved diagnostic tests and accessibility are essential for controlling the outbreak of monkeypox. We describe a saliva‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for monkeypox virus, in vitro test performance, and clinical implementation of that assay in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Palm Springs, CA. Finally, using prespecified search terms, we conducted a systematic rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science online databases of studies reporting the performance of oral pharyngeal or saliva‐based tests for the monkeypox virus. The assay showed in silico inclusivity of 100% for 97 strains of monkeypox virus, with an analytic sensitivity of 250 copies/ml, and 100% agreement compared to known positive and negative specimens. Clinical testing identified 22 cases of monkeypox among 132 individuals (16.7%), of which 16 (72.7%) reported symptoms, 4 (18.2%) without a rash at the time of testing. Of an additional 18 patients with positive lesion tests, 16 (88.9%) had positive saliva tests. Our systematic review identified six studies; 100% of tests on oropharyngeal specimens from 23 patients agreed with the PCR test result of a lesion. Saliva‐based PCR tests are potential tools for case identification, and further evaluation of the performance of such tests is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10091791/ /pubmed/36183189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Allan‐Blitz, Lao‐Tzu Carragher, Kevin Sukhija‐Cohen, Adam Ritchie, Phyllis Scott, Hyman Li, Hong Klausner, Jeffrey D. Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title | Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title_full | Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title_fullStr | Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title_short | Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
title_sort | laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva‐based test for monkeypox virus |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allanblitzlaotzu laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT carragherkevin laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT sukhijacohenadam laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT ritchiephyllis laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT scotthyman laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT lihong laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus AT klausnerjeffreyd laboratoryvalidationandclinicalperformanceofasalivabasedtestformonkeypoxvirus |