Cargando…

Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals

Small‐scale fisheries account for 90% of global fishers and 40% of the global catch. Effectively managing small‐scale fisheries is, therefore, crucial to progressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Co‐management and community‐based fisheries management are widely considered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smallhorn‐West, Patrick, Cohen, Philippa J., Phillips, Michael, Jupiter, Stacy D., Govan, Hugh, Pressey, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13977
_version_ 1785023202760589312
author Smallhorn‐West, Patrick
Cohen, Philippa J.
Phillips, Michael
Jupiter, Stacy D.
Govan, Hugh
Pressey, Robert L.
author_facet Smallhorn‐West, Patrick
Cohen, Philippa J.
Phillips, Michael
Jupiter, Stacy D.
Govan, Hugh
Pressey, Robert L.
author_sort Smallhorn‐West, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Small‐scale fisheries account for 90% of global fishers and 40% of the global catch. Effectively managing small‐scale fisheries is, therefore, crucial to progressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Co‐management and community‐based fisheries management are widely considered the most appropriate forms of governance for many small‐scale fisheries. We outlined relationships between small‐scale fisheries co‐management and attainment of the SDGs, including evidence for impacts and gaps in dominant logic. We identified 11 targets across five SDGs to which small‐scale fisheries co‐management (including community‐based fisheries management) can contribute; the theory of change by which these contributions could be achieved; and the strength of evidence for progress toward SDG targets related to various co‐management strategies. Our theory of change links the 11 SDG targets by qualifying that progress toward some targets is contingent on others being achieved first. We then reviewed 58 case studies of co‐management impacts from the Pacific Islands––a region rich in local marine governance––to evaluate evidence of where, to what degree, and with how much certainty different co‐management strategies conferred positive impacts to each SDG target. These strategies included access restrictions, permanent area closures, periodic closures, and gear and species restrictions. Although many studies provide evidence linking multiple co‐management strategies to improvements in resource status (SDG 14.4), there was limited evidence of follow‐on effects, such as improvements in catch (SDG 2.3, 2.4), livelihoods (SDG 1.2), consumption (SDG 2.1), and nutrition (SDG 2.2). Our findings suggest that leaps of logic and assumptions are prevalent in co‐management planning and evaluation. Hence, when evaluating co‐management impacts against the SDGs, consideration of ultimate goals is required, otherwise, there is a risk of shortfalls between aspirations and impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100917922023-04-13 Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals Smallhorn‐West, Patrick Cohen, Philippa J. Phillips, Michael Jupiter, Stacy D. Govan, Hugh Pressey, Robert L. Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Small‐scale fisheries account for 90% of global fishers and 40% of the global catch. Effectively managing small‐scale fisheries is, therefore, crucial to progressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Co‐management and community‐based fisheries management are widely considered the most appropriate forms of governance for many small‐scale fisheries. We outlined relationships between small‐scale fisheries co‐management and attainment of the SDGs, including evidence for impacts and gaps in dominant logic. We identified 11 targets across five SDGs to which small‐scale fisheries co‐management (including community‐based fisheries management) can contribute; the theory of change by which these contributions could be achieved; and the strength of evidence for progress toward SDG targets related to various co‐management strategies. Our theory of change links the 11 SDG targets by qualifying that progress toward some targets is contingent on others being achieved first. We then reviewed 58 case studies of co‐management impacts from the Pacific Islands––a region rich in local marine governance––to evaluate evidence of where, to what degree, and with how much certainty different co‐management strategies conferred positive impacts to each SDG target. These strategies included access restrictions, permanent area closures, periodic closures, and gear and species restrictions. Although many studies provide evidence linking multiple co‐management strategies to improvements in resource status (SDG 14.4), there was limited evidence of follow‐on effects, such as improvements in catch (SDG 2.3, 2.4), livelihoods (SDG 1.2), consumption (SDG 2.1), and nutrition (SDG 2.2). Our findings suggest that leaps of logic and assumptions are prevalent in co‐management planning and evaluation. Hence, when evaluating co‐management impacts against the SDGs, consideration of ultimate goals is required, otherwise, there is a risk of shortfalls between aspirations and impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-19 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10091792/ /pubmed/35866368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13977 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Smallhorn‐West, Patrick
Cohen, Philippa J.
Phillips, Michael
Jupiter, Stacy D.
Govan, Hugh
Pressey, Robert L.
Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title_full Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title_fullStr Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title_full_unstemmed Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title_short Linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals
title_sort linking small‐scale fisheries co‐management to u.n. sustainable development goals
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13977
work_keys_str_mv AT smallhornwestpatrick linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals
AT cohenphilippaj linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals
AT phillipsmichael linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals
AT jupiterstacyd linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals
AT govanhugh linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals
AT presseyrobertl linkingsmallscalefisheriescomanagementtounsustainabledevelopmentgoals