Cargando…
The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registrati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009 |
_version_ | 1785023208198504448 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton, Adam Singh, Ashi Friedland, Bernard Jamjoom, Faris Z. Griseto, Neil Gallucci, German O. |
author_facet | Hamilton, Adam Singh, Ashi Friedland, Bernard Jamjoom, Faris Z. Griseto, Neil Gallucci, German O. |
author_sort | Hamilton, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computer tomography data and intra‐oral scans from 20 patients were included. Small FoV CBCT's were created by digitally segmenting a large FoV into three sextants. Virtual implant planning was performed. Digital intra‐oral scans were repeatedly registered onto their corresponding large and small FoV CBCT datasets. The distances and angulations between the matching implant positions of each repeated registration were used to determine the precision of the registration process. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Paired Tests were used to compare the differences between large FoV and small FoV. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p = .05. RESULTS: Differences in 3D implant position based on the registration precision between small FoV and large FoV present at both the implant entry point (0.37 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.23 mm, p = .482) and implant tip (0.49 ± 0.34 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.24 mm, p < .001). Differences in overall angular precision were observed between small FOV and large FoV (1.43 ± 1.36° vs 0.51 ± 0.38°, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CBCT with a small FoV is accompanied by greater precision errors in intra‐oral scan registration. However, when sufficient well‐distributed teeth are visible in small FoV CBCT, the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration appears to be within clinically acceptable limits for sCAIS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10091816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100918162023-04-13 The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis Hamilton, Adam Singh, Ashi Friedland, Bernard Jamjoom, Faris Z. Griseto, Neil Gallucci, German O. Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computer tomography data and intra‐oral scans from 20 patients were included. Small FoV CBCT's were created by digitally segmenting a large FoV into three sextants. Virtual implant planning was performed. Digital intra‐oral scans were repeatedly registered onto their corresponding large and small FoV CBCT datasets. The distances and angulations between the matching implant positions of each repeated registration were used to determine the precision of the registration process. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Paired Tests were used to compare the differences between large FoV and small FoV. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p = .05. RESULTS: Differences in 3D implant position based on the registration precision between small FoV and large FoV present at both the implant entry point (0.37 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.23 mm, p = .482) and implant tip (0.49 ± 0.34 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.24 mm, p < .001). Differences in overall angular precision were observed between small FOV and large FoV (1.43 ± 1.36° vs 0.51 ± 0.38°, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CBCT with a small FoV is accompanied by greater precision errors in intra‐oral scan registration. However, when sufficient well‐distributed teeth are visible in small FoV CBCT, the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration appears to be within clinically acceptable limits for sCAIS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-28 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10091816/ /pubmed/36239539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hamilton, Adam Singh, Ashi Friedland, Bernard Jamjoom, Faris Z. Griseto, Neil Gallucci, German O. The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title | The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title_full | The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title_fullStr | The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title_short | The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis |
title_sort | impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: a cbct analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltonadam theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT singhashi theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT friedlandbernard theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT jamjoomfarisz theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT grisetoneil theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT galluccigermano theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT hamiltonadam impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT singhashi impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT friedlandbernard impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT jamjoomfarisz impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT grisetoneil impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis AT galluccigermano impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis |