Cargando…

The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis

OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, Adam, Singh, Ashi, Friedland, Bernard, Jamjoom, Faris Z., Griseto, Neil, Gallucci, German O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009
_version_ 1785023208198504448
author Hamilton, Adam
Singh, Ashi
Friedland, Bernard
Jamjoom, Faris Z.
Griseto, Neil
Gallucci, German O.
author_facet Hamilton, Adam
Singh, Ashi
Friedland, Bernard
Jamjoom, Faris Z.
Griseto, Neil
Gallucci, German O.
author_sort Hamilton, Adam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computer tomography data and intra‐oral scans from 20 patients were included. Small FoV CBCT's were created by digitally segmenting a large FoV into three sextants. Virtual implant planning was performed. Digital intra‐oral scans were repeatedly registered onto their corresponding large and small FoV CBCT datasets. The distances and angulations between the matching implant positions of each repeated registration were used to determine the precision of the registration process. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Paired Tests were used to compare the differences between large FoV and small FoV. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p = .05. RESULTS: Differences in 3D implant position based on the registration precision between small FoV and large FoV present at both the implant entry point (0.37 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.23 mm, p = .482) and implant tip (0.49 ± 0.34 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.24 mm, p < .001). Differences in overall angular precision were observed between small FOV and large FoV (1.43 ± 1.36° vs 0.51 ± 0.38°, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CBCT with a small FoV is accompanied by greater precision errors in intra‐oral scan registration. However, when sufficient well‐distributed teeth are visible in small FoV CBCT, the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration appears to be within clinically acceptable limits for sCAIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100918162023-04-13 The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis Hamilton, Adam Singh, Ashi Friedland, Bernard Jamjoom, Faris Z. Griseto, Neil Gallucci, German O. Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computer tomography data and intra‐oral scans from 20 patients were included. Small FoV CBCT's were created by digitally segmenting a large FoV into three sextants. Virtual implant planning was performed. Digital intra‐oral scans were repeatedly registered onto their corresponding large and small FoV CBCT datasets. The distances and angulations between the matching implant positions of each repeated registration were used to determine the precision of the registration process. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Paired Tests were used to compare the differences between large FoV and small FoV. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p = .05. RESULTS: Differences in 3D implant position based on the registration precision between small FoV and large FoV present at both the implant entry point (0.37 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.23 mm, p = .482) and implant tip (0.49 ± 0.34 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.24 mm, p < .001). Differences in overall angular precision were observed between small FOV and large FoV (1.43 ± 1.36° vs 0.51 ± 0.38°, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CBCT with a small FoV is accompanied by greater precision errors in intra‐oral scan registration. However, when sufficient well‐distributed teeth are visible in small FoV CBCT, the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration appears to be within clinically acceptable limits for sCAIS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-28 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10091816/ /pubmed/36239539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hamilton, Adam
Singh, Ashi
Friedland, Bernard
Jamjoom, Faris Z.
Griseto, Neil
Gallucci, German O.
The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title_full The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title_fullStr The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title_short The impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A CBCT analysis
title_sort impact of cone beam computer tomography field of view on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration for static computer‐assisted implant surgery: a cbct analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14009
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonadam theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT singhashi theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT friedlandbernard theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT jamjoomfarisz theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT grisetoneil theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT galluccigermano theimpactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT hamiltonadam impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT singhashi impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT friedlandbernard impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT jamjoomfarisz impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT grisetoneil impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis
AT galluccigermano impactofconebeamcomputertomographyfieldofviewontheprecisionofdigitalintraoralscanregistrationforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryacbctanalysis