Cargando…
Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064265 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83 |
_version_ | 1785023222124642304 |
---|---|
author | Kwong, Justin Honey, R. John D’A. Lee, Jason Y. Ordon, Michael |
author_facet | Kwong, Justin Honey, R. John D’A. Lee, Jason Y. Ordon, Michael |
author_sort | Kwong, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determine optimal stent length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was e-mailed in 2019 to all members of the Endourology Society. The survey sought to assess what methods are commonly used to determine choice of stent length, along with frequency of stent placement post ureteroscopy, duration of stenting, availability of different stent lengths and the use of stent tether. RESULTS: 301 urologists (15.1%) responded to our survey. Following ureteroscopy, 84.5% of respondents would stent at least 50% of the time. Following uncomplicated ureteroscopy, most respondents (52.0%) would leave a stent for 2–7 days. Patient height was most commonly ranked first as the method of choice in determining stent length (47.0%), followed by estimation based on experience only (20.6%) and intra-operative direct measurement of ureteric length (19.1%). Most respondents utilized multiple methods in determination of optimal stent length. Most respondents (66.5%) were interested in a simple intra-operative technique utilizing a special ureteral catheter that would help choose the most appropriate stent length. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ureteroscopy stent insertion is common and patient height is the most common method of choice used in determining optimal stent length. Most respondents were interested in using a simple, novel ureteral catheter device that would allow them to more accurately select optimal stent length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10091891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100918912023-04-13 Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons Kwong, Justin Honey, R. John D’A. Lee, Jason Y. Ordon, Michael Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determine optimal stent length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was e-mailed in 2019 to all members of the Endourology Society. The survey sought to assess what methods are commonly used to determine choice of stent length, along with frequency of stent placement post ureteroscopy, duration of stenting, availability of different stent lengths and the use of stent tether. RESULTS: 301 urologists (15.1%) responded to our survey. Following ureteroscopy, 84.5% of respondents would stent at least 50% of the time. Following uncomplicated ureteroscopy, most respondents (52.0%) would leave a stent for 2–7 days. Patient height was most commonly ranked first as the method of choice in determining stent length (47.0%), followed by estimation based on experience only (20.6%) and intra-operative direct measurement of ureteric length (19.1%). Most respondents utilized multiple methods in determination of optimal stent length. Most respondents (66.5%) were interested in a simple intra-operative technique utilizing a special ureteral catheter that would help choose the most appropriate stent length. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ureteroscopy stent insertion is common and patient height is the most common method of choice used in determining optimal stent length. Most respondents were interested in using a simple, novel ureteral catheter device that would allow them to more accurately select optimal stent length. Polish Urological Association 2023-01-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10091891/ /pubmed/37064265 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kwong, Justin Honey, R. John D’A. Lee, Jason Y. Ordon, Michael Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title | Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title_full | Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title_fullStr | Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title_short | Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
title_sort | determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064265 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwongjustin determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons AT honeyrjohnda determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons AT leejasony determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons AT ordonmichael determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons |