Cargando…

Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwong, Justin, Honey, R. John D’A., Lee, Jason Y., Ordon, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064265
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83
_version_ 1785023222124642304
author Kwong, Justin
Honey, R. John D’A.
Lee, Jason Y.
Ordon, Michael
author_facet Kwong, Justin
Honey, R. John D’A.
Lee, Jason Y.
Ordon, Michael
author_sort Kwong, Justin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determine optimal stent length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was e-mailed in 2019 to all members of the Endourology Society. The survey sought to assess what methods are commonly used to determine choice of stent length, along with frequency of stent placement post ureteroscopy, duration of stenting, availability of different stent lengths and the use of stent tether. RESULTS: 301 urologists (15.1%) responded to our survey. Following ureteroscopy, 84.5% of respondents would stent at least 50% of the time. Following uncomplicated ureteroscopy, most respondents (52.0%) would leave a stent for 2–7 days. Patient height was most commonly ranked first as the method of choice in determining stent length (47.0%), followed by estimation based on experience only (20.6%) and intra-operative direct measurement of ureteric length (19.1%). Most respondents utilized multiple methods in determination of optimal stent length. Most respondents (66.5%) were interested in a simple intra-operative technique utilizing a special ureteral catheter that would help choose the most appropriate stent length. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ureteroscopy stent insertion is common and patient height is the most common method of choice used in determining optimal stent length. Most respondents were interested in using a simple, novel ureteral catheter device that would allow them to more accurately select optimal stent length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100918912023-04-13 Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons Kwong, Justin Honey, R. John D’A. Lee, Jason Y. Ordon, Michael Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Ureteral double-J stent length is an important factor affecting stent-related symptoms. Multiple techniques exist to determine ideal stent length for a given patient, however, little is known about what techniques urologists rely on. Our objective was to identify how urologists determine optimal stent length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was e-mailed in 2019 to all members of the Endourology Society. The survey sought to assess what methods are commonly used to determine choice of stent length, along with frequency of stent placement post ureteroscopy, duration of stenting, availability of different stent lengths and the use of stent tether. RESULTS: 301 urologists (15.1%) responded to our survey. Following ureteroscopy, 84.5% of respondents would stent at least 50% of the time. Following uncomplicated ureteroscopy, most respondents (52.0%) would leave a stent for 2–7 days. Patient height was most commonly ranked first as the method of choice in determining stent length (47.0%), followed by estimation based on experience only (20.6%) and intra-operative direct measurement of ureteric length (19.1%). Most respondents utilized multiple methods in determination of optimal stent length. Most respondents (66.5%) were interested in a simple intra-operative technique utilizing a special ureteral catheter that would help choose the most appropriate stent length. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ureteroscopy stent insertion is common and patient height is the most common method of choice used in determining optimal stent length. Most respondents were interested in using a simple, novel ureteral catheter device that would allow them to more accurately select optimal stent length. Polish Urological Association 2023-01-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10091891/ /pubmed/37064265 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kwong, Justin
Honey, R. John D’A.
Lee, Jason Y.
Ordon, Michael
Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title_full Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title_fullStr Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title_short Determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
title_sort determination of optimal stent length: a survey of urologic surgeons
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064265
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.83
work_keys_str_mv AT kwongjustin determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons
AT honeyrjohnda determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons
AT leejasony determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons
AT ordonmichael determinationofoptimalstentlengthasurveyofurologicsurgeons