Cargando…

Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India

BACKGROUND: This study presents the preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) initiated in January 2006 in India to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in reducing breast cancer mortality as compared to a no‐screening control group reported significant do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadas, Kunnambath, Basu, Partha, Mathew, Beela S., Muwonge, Richard, Venugopal, Muraleedharan, Prakasan, Aparna M., Malu, Rafi, Lucas, Eric, Augustine, Paul, Mony, Rari P., Thara, Somanathan, Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34526
_version_ 1785023231329042432
author Ramadas, Kunnambath
Basu, Partha
Mathew, Beela S.
Muwonge, Richard
Venugopal, Muraleedharan
Prakasan, Aparna M.
Malu, Rafi
Lucas, Eric
Augustine, Paul
Mony, Rari P.
Thara, Somanathan
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
author_facet Ramadas, Kunnambath
Basu, Partha
Mathew, Beela S.
Muwonge, Richard
Venugopal, Muraleedharan
Prakasan, Aparna M.
Malu, Rafi
Lucas, Eric
Augustine, Paul
Mony, Rari P.
Thara, Somanathan
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
author_sort Ramadas, Kunnambath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study presents the preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) initiated in January 2006 in India to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in reducing breast cancer mortality as compared to a no‐screening control group reported significant downstaging in the intervention group. The present manuscript reports long‐term follow‐up outcomes. METHODS: Women 30–69 years old from 133 intervention clusters and 141 control clusters were invited to participate. Women in the intervention arm underwent three rounds of CBE every 3 years. CBE‐positive women were reexamined by a physician, and triple‐assessment was performed on those confirmed to have abnormalities. All participants were followed through home visits and linkage with population‐based cancer registry. RESULTS: Of the 55,843 eligible women in the intervention arm, 95.7% had CBE at least once and 11.5% were CBE‐positive. Breast cancers were diagnosed in 335 participants in the intervention group and 273 in the control group (N = 59,447). Age‐standardized incidence rate of early cancer was 30.4 of 100,000 in the intervention and 21.9 of 100,000 in the control group, with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.8). The age‐standardized breast cancer mortality rates were 11.3 and 11.1 per 100,000 in intervention and control arms, respectively (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8–1.5) after 15 years. Five‐year breast cancer survival rates were 77.0% in the intervention and 71.2% in the control groups (overall p value = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Triennial CBE screening failed to demonstrate any mortality benefit despite achieving a shift toward earlier stage at detection and improved survival in the intervention arm. CBE is a valuable tool for diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women especially in areas where mammography and/or breast cancer screening programs are not widely available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10091935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100919352023-04-13 Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India Ramadas, Kunnambath Basu, Partha Mathew, Beela S. Muwonge, Richard Venugopal, Muraleedharan Prakasan, Aparna M. Malu, Rafi Lucas, Eric Augustine, Paul Mony, Rari P. Thara, Somanathan Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: This study presents the preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) initiated in January 2006 in India to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in reducing breast cancer mortality as compared to a no‐screening control group reported significant downstaging in the intervention group. The present manuscript reports long‐term follow‐up outcomes. METHODS: Women 30–69 years old from 133 intervention clusters and 141 control clusters were invited to participate. Women in the intervention arm underwent three rounds of CBE every 3 years. CBE‐positive women were reexamined by a physician, and triple‐assessment was performed on those confirmed to have abnormalities. All participants were followed through home visits and linkage with population‐based cancer registry. RESULTS: Of the 55,843 eligible women in the intervention arm, 95.7% had CBE at least once and 11.5% were CBE‐positive. Breast cancers were diagnosed in 335 participants in the intervention group and 273 in the control group (N = 59,447). Age‐standardized incidence rate of early cancer was 30.4 of 100,000 in the intervention and 21.9 of 100,000 in the control group, with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.8). The age‐standardized breast cancer mortality rates were 11.3 and 11.1 per 100,000 in intervention and control arms, respectively (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8–1.5) after 15 years. Five‐year breast cancer survival rates were 77.0% in the intervention and 71.2% in the control groups (overall p value = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Triennial CBE screening failed to demonstrate any mortality benefit despite achieving a shift toward earlier stage at detection and improved survival in the intervention arm. CBE is a valuable tool for diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women especially in areas where mammography and/or breast cancer screening programs are not widely available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-01 2023-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10091935/ /pubmed/36321193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34526 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Ramadas, Kunnambath
Basu, Partha
Mathew, Beela S.
Muwonge, Richard
Venugopal, Muraleedharan
Prakasan, Aparna M.
Malu, Rafi
Lucas, Eric
Augustine, Paul
Mony, Rari P.
Thara, Somanathan
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title_full Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title_fullStr Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title_short Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India
title_sort effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14‐years follow‐up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in trivandrum, india
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34526
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadaskunnambath effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT basupartha effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT mathewbeelas effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT muwongerichard effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT venugopalmuraleedharan effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT prakasanaparnam effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT malurafi effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT lucaseric effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT augustinepaul effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT monyrarip effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT tharasomanathan effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia
AT sankaranarayananrengaswamy effectivenessoftriennialscreeningwithclinicalbreastexamination14yearsfollowupoutcomesofrandomizedclinicaltrialintrivandrumindia